Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31234451›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Estimation of Ankle Joint Power during Walking Using Two Inertial Sensors.

Xianta Jiang, Mohsen Gholami, Mahta Khoshnam, Janice J Eng, Carlo Menon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xianta JiangMenrva Research Group, Schools of Mechatronic Systems & Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. xiantaj@sfu.ca.
Mohsen GholamiMenrva Research Group, Schools of Mechatronic Systems & Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. mohsen_gholami@sfu.ca.
Mahta KhoshnamMenrva Research Group, Schools of Mechatronic Systems & Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. mahta_khoshnam_tehrani@sfu.ca.
Janice J EngDepartment of Physical Therapy, GF Strong Rehab Centre, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver Campus, University of British Columbia and Rehabilitation Research Program, 212-2177 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada. janice.eng@ubc.ca.
Carlo MenonMenrva Research Group, Schools of Mechatronic Systems & Engineering Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Dr, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada. cmenon@sfu.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-2309-9977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Ankle joint power, as an indicator of the ability to control lower limbs, is of great relevance for clinical diagnosis of gait impairment and control of lower limb prosthesis. However, the majority of available techniques for estimating joint power are based on inverse dynamics methods, which require performing a biomechanical analysis of the foot and using a highly instrumented environment to tune the parameters of the resulting biomechanical model. Such techniques are not generally applicable to real-world scenarios in which gait monitoring outside of the clinical setting is desired. This paper proposes a viable alternative to such techniques by using machine learning algorithms to estimate ankle joint power from data collected by two miniature inertial measurement units (IMUs) on the foot and shank, (2) Methods: Nine participants walked on a force-plate-instrumented treadmill wearing two IMUs. The data from the IMUs were processed to train and test a random forest model to estimate ankle joint power. The performance of the model was then evaluated by comparing the estimated power values to the reference values provided by the motion tracking system and the force-plate-instrumented treadmill. (3) Results: The proposed method achieved a high accuracy with the correlation coefficient, root mean square error, and normalized root mean square error of 0.98, 0.06 w/kg, and 1.05% in the intra-subject test, and 0.92, 0.13 w/kg, and 2.37% in inter-subject test, respectively. The difference between the predicted and true peak power values was 0.01 w/kg and 0.14 w/kg with a delay of 0.4% and 0.4% of gait cycle duration for the intra- and inter-subject testing, respectively. (4) Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate the feasibility of using only two IMUs to estimate ankle joint power. The proposed technique provides a basis for developing a portable and compact gait monitoring system that can potentially offer monitoring and reporting on ankle joint power in real-time during activities of daily living.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesMonitoring, PhysiologicActivities of Daily LivingAlgorithmsAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaExercise TestFootGaitGait AnalysisHumansLower ExtremityWalkingWireless Technologyankle powergait analysisIMUjoint power

Identifiers

PMID31234451
PMCPMC6632056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.