Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31234270›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019

Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Celiac Disease.

Alka Singh, Atreyi Pramanik, Pragyan Acharya, Govind K Makharia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein in celiac disease: Finding its place in diagnosis and monitoring.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  3. The follow-up of patients with celiac disease.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Global Approach to Follow-Up of Celiac Disease.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Small Bowel-Key Player in Health and Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alka SinghDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029, India. singhalka34@gmail.com.
Atreyi PramanikDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029, India. atreyipram91@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5688-9860
Pragyan AcharyaDepartment of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029, India. dr.pragyan.acharya@gmail.com.
Govind K MakhariaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition; All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi-110029, India. govindmakharia@gmail.com.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Once thought to be uncommon, celiac disease has now become a common disease globally. While avoidance of the gluten-containing diet is the only effective treatment so far, many new targets are being explored for the development of new drugs for its treatment. The endpoints of therapy include not only reversal of symptoms, normalization of immunological abnormalities and healing of mucosa, but also maintenance of remission of the disease by strict adherence of the gluten-free diet (GFD). There is no single gold standard test for the diagnosis of celiac disease and the diagnosis is based on the presence of a combination of characteristics including the presence of a celiac-specific antibody (anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody, anti-endomysial antibody or anti-deamidated gliadin peptide antibody) and demonstration of villous abnormalities. While the demonstration of enteropathy is an important criterion for a definite diagnosis of celiac disease, it requires endoscopic examination which is perceived as an invasive procedure. The capability of prediction of enteropathy by the presence of the high titer of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody led to an option of making a diagnosis even without obtaining mucosal biopsies. While present day diagnostic tests are great, they, however, have certain limitations. Therefore, there is a need for biomarkers for screening of patients, prediction of enteropathy, and monitoring of patients for adherence of the gluten-free diet. Efforts are now being made to explore various biomarkers which reflect different changes that occur in the intestinal mucosa using modern day tools including transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. In the present review, we have discussed comprehensively the pros and cons of available biomarkers and also summarized the current status of emerging biomarkers for the screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of celiac disease.

Indexed as

biomarkerceliac diseaseenteropathyserology

Identifiers

PMID31234270
PMCPMC6616864
OpenAlexW2949699418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.