ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2019
Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Celiac Disease.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Correlation Between Non-Invasive Biomarkers and Histological Healing in Children with Celiac Disease: Role of Cytokines, Intestinal Fatty Acid-Binding Protein, and Tissue Transglutaminase Antibodies.Pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology & nutrition · 2026Article
- Intestinal fatty acid-binding protein in celiac disease: Finding its place in diagnosis and monitoring.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- The follow-up of patients with celiac disease.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2025Review
- Selective determination of 3,5-dihydroxycinnamic acid in urine samples as gluten intake biomarker: high-performance thin-layer chromatography combined with colorimetric detection.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
- Article
- Gluten-Free Diet Adherence Evaluation in Adults with Long-Standing Celiac Disease.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Rapid diagnosis of celiac disease based on plasma Raman spectroscopy combined with deep learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Global Approach to Follow-Up of Celiac Disease.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Intestinal fatty acid binding protein is a disease biomarker in paediatric coeliac disease and Crohn's disease.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Relationship of citrulline and tissue transglutaminase antibody with duodenal histopathology among children with celiac disease.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Analytical and functional approaches to assess the immunogenicity of gluten proteins.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Review
- Diagnosing and Monitoring Celiac Patients with Selective IgA Deficiency: Still an Open Issue.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2021Review
- The Multiomics Analyses of Fecal Matrix and Its Significance to Coeliac Disease Gut Profiling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Diagnosing coeliac disease: Out with the old and in with the new?World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Small Bowel-Key Player in Health and Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Once thought to be uncommon, celiac disease has now become a common disease globally. While avoidance of the gluten-containing diet is the only effective treatment so far, many new targets are being explored for the development of new drugs for its treatment. The endpoints of therapy include not only reversal of symptoms, normalization of immunological abnormalities and healing of mucosa, but also maintenance of remission of the disease by strict adherence of the gluten-free diet (GFD). There is no single gold standard test for the diagnosis of celiac disease and the diagnosis is based on the presence of a combination of characteristics including the presence of a celiac-specific antibody (anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody, anti-endomysial antibody or anti-deamidated gliadin peptide antibody) and demonstration of villous abnormalities. While the demonstration of enteropathy is an important criterion for a definite diagnosis of celiac disease, it requires endoscopic examination which is perceived as an invasive procedure. The capability of prediction of enteropathy by the presence of the high titer of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody led to an option of making a diagnosis even without obtaining mucosal biopsies. While present day diagnostic tests are great, they, however, have certain limitations. Therefore, there is a need for biomarkers for screening of patients, prediction of enteropathy, and monitoring of patients for adherence of the gluten-free diet. Efforts are now being made to explore various biomarkers which reflect different changes that occur in the intestinal mucosa using modern day tools including transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. In the present review, we have discussed comprehensively the pros and cons of available biomarkers and also summarized the current status of emerging biomarkers for the screening, diagnosis, and monitoring of celiac disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.