Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31234108›Full record

ArticleHearing research2019

A canonical oscillator model of cochlear dynamics.

Karl D Lerud, Ji Chul Kim, Felix V Almonte, Laurel H Carney, Edward W Large

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Musical neurodynamics.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  2. Something in Our Ears Is Oscillating, but What? A Modeller's View of Efforts to Model Spontaneous Emissions.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Oscillatory Entrainment of the Frequency-following Response in Auditory Cortical and Subcortical Structures.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karl D LerudDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Ji Chul KimDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
Felix V AlmonteCenter for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Laurel H CarneyBiomedical Engineering and Neurobiology & Anatomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Edward W LargeDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA. Electronic address: edward.large@uconn.edu.

Funding

AUDITORY PROCESSING OF COMPLEX SOUNDSR01DC001641 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Kenneth Stuart Henry · 1997 to 2026
$11.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC001641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonlinear responses to acoustic signals arise through active processes in the cochlea, which has an exquisite sensitivity and wide dynamic range that can be explained by critical nonlinear oscillations of outer hair cells. Here we ask how the interaction of critical nonlinearities with the basilar membrane and other organ of Corti components could determine tuning properties of the mammalian cochlea. We propose a canonical oscillator model that captures the dynamics of the interaction between the basilar membrane and organ of Corti, using a pair of coupled oscillators for each place along the cochlea. We analyze two models in which a linear oscillator, representing basilar membrane dynamics, is coupled to a nonlinear oscillator poised at a Hopf instability. The coupling in the first model is unidirectional, and that of the second is bidirectional. Parameters are determined by fitting 496 auditory-nerve (AN) tuning curves of macaque monkeys. We find that the unidirectionally and bidirectionally coupled models account equally well for threshold tuning. In addition, however, the bidirectionally coupled model exhibits low-amplitude, spontaneous oscillation in the absence of stimulation, predicting that phase locking will occur before a significant increase in firing frequency, in accordance with well known empirical observations. This leads us to a canonical oscillator cochlear model based on the fundamental principles of critical nonlinear oscillation and coupling dynamics. The model is more biologically realistic than widely used linear or nonlinear filter-based models, yet parsimoniously displays key features of nonlinear mechanistic models. It is efficient enough for computational studies of auditory perception and auditory physiology.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionHearingModels, NeurologicalAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PathwaysCochleaComputer SimulationHair Cells, Auditory, OuterMacacaNonlinear DynamicsOscillometryTime FactorsAuditoryCochleaDynamicsModelingOscillation

Identifiers

PMID31234108
PMCPMC6669083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.