Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31233890›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2019

Bi-layered micro-fibre reinforced hydrogels for articular cartilage regeneration.

Miguel Castilho, Vivian Mouser, Mike Chen, Jos Malda, Keita Ito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Biological Reinforced Concrete for Cartilage Repair With 3D Printing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Miguel CastilhoDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: M.DiasCastilho@umcutrecht.nl.
Vivian MouserOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Mike ChenSchool of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Jos MaldaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Keita ItoDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Orthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands; Regenerative Medicine Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: K.Ito@tue.nl.

Funding

European Research Council 647426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Articular cartilage has limited capacity for regeneration and when damaged cannot be repaired with currently available metallic or synthetic implants. We aim to bioengineer a microfibre-reinforced hydrogel that can capture the zonal depth-dependent mechanical properties of native cartilage, and simultaneously support neo-cartilage formation. With this goal, a sophisticated bi-layered microfibre architecture, combining a densely distributed crossed fibre mat (superficial tangential zone, STZ) and a uniform box structure (middle and deep zone, MDZ), was successfully manufactured via melt electrospinning and combined with a gelatin-methacrylamide hydrogel. The inclusion of a thin STZ layer greatly increased the composite construct's peak modulus under both incongruent (3.2-fold) and congruent (2.1-fold) loading, as compared to hydrogels reinforced with only a uniform MDZ structure. Notably, the stress relaxation response of the bi-layered composite construct was comparable to the tested native cartilage tissue. Furthermore, similar production of sulphated glycosaminoglycans and collagen II was observed for the novel composite constructs cultured under mechanical conditioning w/o TGF-ß1 supplementation and in static conditions w/TGF-ß1 supplementation, which confirmed the capability of the novel composite construct to support neo-cartilage formation upon mechanical stimulation. To conclude, these results are an important step towards the design and manufacture of biomechanically competent implants for cartilage regeneration. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Damage to articular cartilage results in severe pain and joint disfunction that cannot be treated with currently available implants. This study presents a sophisticated bioengineered bi-layered fibre reinforced cell-laden hydrogel that can approximate the functional mechanical properties of native cartilage. For the first time, the importance of incorporating a viable superficial tangential zone (STZ) - like structure to improve the load-bearing properties of bioengineered constructs, particularly when in-congruent surfaces are compressed, is demonstrated. The present work also provides new insights for the development of implants that are able to promote and guide new cartilaginous tissue formation upon physiologically relevant mechanical stimulation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCartilage, ArticularChondrocytesGelatinHorsesHydrogelsMethacrylatesPrinting, Three-DimensionalRegenerationSwineTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsGelatinHydrogelsMethacrylatesCartilage regenerationFibre-reinforced hydrogelsMelt electrowritingOsteoarthritisSuperficial tangential zone

Identifiers

PMID31233890
PMCPMC7116027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.