Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31233516›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Knowledge about dietary supplements and trust in advertising them: Development and validation of the questionnaires and preliminary results of the association between the constructs.

Michał Seweryn Karbownik, Ewelina Paul, Maja Nowicka, Zuzanna Nowicka, Radosław Przemysław Kowalczyk, Edward Kowalczyk, Tadeusz Pietras

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04184219 (Determinants of Knowledge About and Use of Dietary Supplements), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04184219 completednot on this map

Determinants of Knowledge About and Use of Dietary Supplements

TypeobservationalSponsorMedical University of LodzRan2019 to 2020Enrolled7,632ConditionsKnowledge, Attitudes, Practice
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Insights into dietary supplements as popular product supporting the diet.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Analysis of self-care strategies among nurses in southern Poland - a cross-sectional survey.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michał Seweryn KarbownikDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4416-2736
Ewelina PaulOSOM STUDIO, Łódź, Poland.
Maja NowickaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6587-2502
Zuzanna NowickaDepartment of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.
Radosław Przemysław KowalczykIndependent scientist, Berlin, Germany.
Edward KowalczykDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.
Tadeusz PietrasDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Lodz, Łódź, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite offering little overall benefit and emerging concerns about their safety, dietary supplements have become increasingly popular. Trust in advertising them may contribute to high confidence in dietary supplements in public opinion.

aimTo develop and validate a screening questionnaire intended for the general public regarding knowledge about dietary supplements and a questionnaire on trust in advertising dietary supplements, and to identify the association between these constructs. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe development and validation of the measures was overseen by the panels of experts. The conceptual frameworks of the constructs were scientifically well grounded. A set of semi-structured interviews and anonymous web-based surveys was performed. The final questionnaire was applied to 220 non-medically educated people and 121 medically educated people.

resultsA 17-item questionnaire on knowledge about dietary supplements and eight-item questionnaire on trust in advertising dietary supplements were developed. The measures presented satisfactory proof of validity, however, the psychometric properties of the questionnaire on knowledge were modest. Both the knowledge about dietary supplements in the study group and trust in advertising them were low. A significant negative relationship was found between knowledge about dietary supplements and trust in advertising them among the general public (Pearson's r = -0.42, 95%CI: -0.52 to -0.30, p<0.0001). This association was especially pronounced in people who reported not taking dietary supplements (Pearson's r = -0.61, 95%CI: -0.76 to -0.39, p<0.0001).

conclusionsThe extensive advertising of dietary supplements appears to be in conflict with promoting evidence-based knowledge about them, which raises substantial concerns for the public health. The results of the study are only preliminary and require further confirmation and exploration.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTrustAdolescentAdultAdvertisingAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsPublic HealthSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31233516
PMCPMC6590799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.