ArticlePLoS computational biology2019
Open collaborative writing with Manubot.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- UV-induced reorganization of 3D genome mediates DNA damage response.Nature communications · 2025Article
- GitHub enables collaborative and reproducible laboratory research.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- CryoVesNet: A dedicated framework for synaptic vesicle segmentation in cryo-electron tomograms.The Journal of cell biology · 2025Article
- Best holdout assessment is sufficient for cancer transcriptomic model selection.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- A publishing infrastructure for Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted academic authoring.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Overview of Bottom-Up Proteomics Using Mass Spectrometry.ACS measurement science au · 2024Review
- Article
- MMV_Im2Im: an open-source microscopy machine vision toolbox for image-to-image transformation.GigaScience · 2024Article
- The probability of edge existence due to node degree: a baseline for network-based predictions.GigaScience · 2024Article
- Optimizer's dilemma: optimization strongly influences model selection in transcriptomic prediction.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Article
- OpenPBTA: The Open Pediatric Brain Tumor Atlas.Cell genomics · 2023Article
- Article
- A publishing infrastructure for AI-assisted academic authoring.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Hetnet connectivity search provides rapid insights into how two biomedical entities are related.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The probability of edge existence due to node degree: a baseline for network-based predictions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Amending the literature through version control.Biology letters · 2023Article
- Article
- Hetnet connectivity search provides rapid insights into how biomedical entities are related.GigaScience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Open, collaborative research is a powerful paradigm that can immensely strengthen the scientific process by integrating broad and diverse expertise. However, traditional research and multi-author writing processes break down at scale. We present new software named Manubot, available at https://manubot.org, to address the challenges of open scholarly writing. Manubot adopts the contribution workflow used by many large-scale open source software projects to enable collaborative authoring of scholarly manuscripts. With Manubot, manuscripts are written in Markdown and stored in a Git repository to precisely track changes over time. By hosting manuscript repositories publicly, such as on GitHub, multiple authors can simultaneously propose and review changes. A cloud service automatically evaluates proposed changes to catch errors. Publication with Manubot is continuous: When a manuscript's source changes, the rendered outputs are rebuilt and republished to a web page. Manubot automates bibliographic tasks by implementing citation by identifier, where users cite persistent identifiers (e.g. DOIs, PubMed IDs, ISBNs, URLs), whose metadata is then retrieved and converted to a user-specified style. Manubot modernizes publishing to align with the ideals of open science by making it transparent, reproducible, immediate, versioned, collaborative, and free of charge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.