Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31233387›Full record

ArticleEmerging microbes & infections2019

The scrub typhus in mainland China: spatiotemporal expansion and risk prediction underpinned by complex factors.

Hongwu Yao, Yixing Wang, Xianmiao Mi, Ye Sun, Kun Liu, Xinlou Li, Xiang Ren, Mengjie Geng, Yang Yang, Liping Wang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging microbes & infections, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cavitary pulmonary tuberculosis withFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Hongwu Yaoa Department of Infection Management and Disease Control , Chinese PLA General Hospital , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
Yixing Wangb The State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity , Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
Xianmiao Mib The State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity , Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
Ye Sunb The State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity , Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
Kun Liub The State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity , Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
Xinlou Lib The State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity , Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
Xiang Renf Division of Infectious Disease, Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Early-warning on Infectious Disease , Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
Mengjie Gengf Division of Infectious Disease, Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Early-warning on Infectious Disease , Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
Yang Yangg Department of Biostatistics , College of Public Health and Health Professions, and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida , Gainesville , FL , USA.
Liping Wangf Division of Infectious Disease, Key Laboratory of Surveillance and Early-warning on Infectious Disease , Chinese Centre for Disease Control and Prevention , Beijing , People's Republic of China.
Wei Liub The State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity , Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology , Beijing , People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9302-8170
Liqun Fangb The State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity , Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology , Beijing , People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mainland China, a geographic northward expansion of scrub typhus has been seen, highlighting the need to understand the factors and identify the risk for disease prevention. Incidence data from 1980 to 2013 were used. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify drivers for spatial spread, and a boosted regression tree (BRT) model was constructed to predict potential risk areas. Since the 1980s, an invasive expansion from South Natural Foci towards North Natural Foci was clearly identified, with the epidemiological heterogeneity observed between two regions, mainly in spatial distribution, seasonality, and demographic characteristics. Survival analysis disclosed significant factors contributing to the spatial expansion as following: being intersected by freeway (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.11-1.54), coverage percentage of broadleaf forest (HR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.06-1.15), and monthly average temperature (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.25-1.30). The BRT models showed that precipitation, sunshine hour, temperature, crop field, and relative humidity contributed substantially to the spatial distribution of scrub typhus. A county-scale risk map was created to predict the regions with high probability of the disease. The current study enabled a comprehensive overview of epidemiological characteristics of scrub typhus in mainland China.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolChinaFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMaleMiddle AgedOrientia tsutsugamushiRisk FactorsScrub TyphusSeasonsSpatio-Temporal Analysisepidemiological featureheterogeneityrisk factorsScrub typhusspatiotemporal expansion

Identifiers

PMID31233387
PMCPMC6598543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.