Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31233217›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2019

Interactive Effects of Naturalistic Drinking Context and Alcohol Sensitivity on Neural Alcohol Cue-Reactivity Responses.

Jorge S Martins, Bruce D Bartholow, M Lynne Cooper, Kelsey M Irvin, Thomas M Piasecki

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Variants of the P3 event-related potential operate as indicators of distinct mechanisms contributing to problematic alcohol use.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jorge S MartinsDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0001-7431-9688
Bruce D BartholowDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
M Lynne CooperDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Kelsey M IrvinDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Thomas M PiaseckiDepartment of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0002-2793-2049
University of Missouri · US

Funding

Supplement to Promote Diversity: Characterizing Low Alcohol Sensitivity in Laboratory and Real-World ContextsR01AA025451 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI BARTHOLOW, BRUCE D, PIASECKI, THOMAS M · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, IP (FCT) SFRH/BD/9261/2013NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsiderable evidence indicates that a low level of subjective response to alcohol's acute effects (i.e., low sensitivity) is associated with enhanced risk for alcohol use disorder (AUD). Recent work suggests that the highest risk response profile consists of blunted sensitivity to alcohol's sedation-like effects, coupled with enhanced sensitivity to alcohol's stimulation-like effects (i.e., differential sensitivity). A largely separate body of work indicates that enhanced reactivity to alcohol-related cues is associated with increased AUD risk.

aimsThe current research examined the extent to which variability in alcohol response phenotypes is associated with enhanced P3 event-related potential (ERP) responses to alcohol-related pictures (ACR-P3), and whether this reactivity varies according to depicted drinking contexts.

methodsEighty young adults (aged 18 to 33 years) completed a self-report measure of alcohol sensitivity (the Alcohol Sensitivity Questionnaire) and viewed images depicting drinking in naturalistic contexts, alcohol and nonalcohol beverages in isolation (devoid of naturalistic drinking context), and neutral nonbeverage control images while ERPs were recorded.

resultsResults indicated that blunted sensitivity to alcohol's sedative-like effects was differentially associated with enhanced ACR-P3 but reduced P3 reactivity to nonalcohol cues. Variation in sensitivity to alcohol's stimulant-like effects was not associated with differential ACR-P3. Contrary to predictions, these effects were not potentiated by drinking contexts.

conclusionsThe current results replicate and extend previous work linking low alcohol sensitivity with enhanced incentive salience for alcohol-related cues and suggest that cues depicting drinking contexts are less likely to differentiate high-risk from low-risk drinkers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlcohol DrinkingCuesEnvironmentEvent-Related Potentials, P300FemaleHumansMalePhenotypePhotic StimulationSelf ReportYoung AdultAlcohol SensitivityCue Reactivityevent-related potentialsIncentive SalienceSocial Context

Identifiers

PMID31233217
PMCPMC6677613
OpenAlexW2953762283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.