Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31233126›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019

The importance of health insurance claims data in creating learning health systems: evaluating care for high-need high-cost patients using the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORNet).

Maureen A Smith, Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin, Menggang Yu, Xinyi Wang, Peter A Nordby, Christine Vogeli, Jonathan Jaffery, Joshua P Metlay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maureen A SmithDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Mary S Vaughan-SarrazinDepartment of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Menggang YuDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Xinyi WangHealth Innovation Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Peter A NordbyHealth Innovation Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Christine VogeliHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Jonathan JafferyOffice of Population Health, UW Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Joshua P MetlayHarvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR002373 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ELIZABETH S BURNSIDE, Allan R. Brasier · 2017 to 2026
$75.9M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCase management programs for high-need high-cost patients are spreading rapidly among health systems. PCORNet has substantial potential to support learning health systems in rapidly evaluating these programs, but access to complete patient data on health care utilization is limited as PCORNet is based on electronic health records not health insurance claims data. Because matching cases to comparison patients on baseline utilization is often a critical component of high-quality observational comparative effectiveness research for high-need high-cost patients, limited access to claims may negatively affect the quality of the matching process. We sought to determine whether the evaluation of programs for high-need high-cost patients required claims data to match cases to comparison patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective cohort study design with multiple measures of before-and-after health care utilization for 1935 case management patients and 3833 matched comparison patients aged 18 years and older from 2011 to 2015. EHR and claims data were extracted from 3 health systems participating in PCORNet.

resultsWithout matching on claims-based health care utilization, the case management programs at 2 of 3 health systems were associated with fewer hospital admissions and emergency visits over the subsequent 12 months. With matching on claims-based health care utilization, case management was no longer associated with admissions and emergency visits at those 2 programs. DISCUSSION: The results of a PCORNet-facilitated evaluation of 3 programs for high-need high-cost patients differed substantially depending on whether claims data were available for matching cases to comparison patients.

conclusionsPartnering with learning health systems to rapidly evaluate programs for high-need high-cost patients will require that PCORNet facilitates comprehensive and timely access to both electronic health records and health insurance claims data.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsInsurance Claim ReviewInsurance, HealthLearning Health SystemAgedCase ManagementComparative Effectiveness ResearchElectronic Health RecordsHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient-Centered CareRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic Factorscase managementcomparative effectiveness researchelectronic health recordshealth care administrative claimslearning health systems

Identifiers

PMID31233126
PMCPMC7647219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.