ArticleMedicine2019
Blood and cerebrospinal fluid characteristics in neonates with a suspected central nervous system infection.
Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identifying the need for surgical intervention in pediatric bacterial meningitis: single-center experience.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Role of neonatal cerebrospinal fluid cytology in correlation to C-reactive protein, blood culture, risk factors and clinical outcomes in neonatal intensive care.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Article
- Safety assessment of multiple repeated percutaneous punctures for the collection of cerebrospinal fluid in rats.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2021Article
- Neonatal bacterial meningitis versus ventriculitis: a cohort-based overview of clinical characteristics, microbiology and imaging.European journal of pediatrics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical signs and symptoms of central nervous system (CNS) infections in neonates are often nonspecific. Therefore, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is performed to diagnose CNS infections. Data on combined microbiological results and their correlation with biochemical characteristics in CSF and blood in infants younger than 90 days are limited. This study provides an overview of microbiological test results, CSF- and hematological characteristics among infants with a clinically suspected CNS infection.This retrospective study included infants younger than 90 days, with a clinically suspected CNS infection who underwent a diagnostic lumbar puncture between January 2012 and January 2014. Data on the presence of microbiological pathogens in CSF, CSF inflammation markers (white blood cell [WBC] counts, protein levels and glucose CSF/serum ratio) and blood inflammatory responses (WBC count, C-reactive protein [CRP], neutrophil percentage) were collected by reviewing patient files.We included data from 576 infants (median age 12.5 days, interquartile range, 6-27 days) of whom 383 (66.5%) were born prematurely. In total, 16 bacterial pathogens (3.0%) and 21 viruses (5.5%) were detected in CSF. Escherichia coli was detected in 5 cases (1.0%), Enterovirus was detected in 12 cases (3.1%). Leucocytosis in CSF was associated with identification of a pathogen in CSF. Increased CRP was associated with the identification of a bacterial pathogen in CSF.Bacterial or viral pathogens were only identified in a small proportion of infants with a clinically suspected CNS infection. Leucocytosis in CSF was associated with CNS infection in infants. An increased CRP was indicative of bacterial meningitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.