Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31232939›Full record

ArticleMedicine2019

Intervention of artemisinin in macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jing Xu, Xiaofeng Hao, Bingwen Lu, Jing Ming, Xiaoyu Li, Yixin Qi, Like Xie

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xiaofeng Hao
Bingwen Lu
Jing Ming
Xiaoyu Li
Yixin Qi
Like Xie
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtemisinin was discovered to be highly effective antimalarial drugs shortly after the isolation of the parent artemisinin in 1971 in China. It is derived from extracts of sweet wormwood (Artemisia annua) and are well established for the treatment of malaria. Recently, artemisinin has been shown that it might have therapeutic value for several other diseases. The purpose of this review is to assess the efficacy of artemisinin as a treatment for macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic literature search will be performed in all available databases to quantitatively review eligible studies and identify all relevant data. We will include randomized controlled trials assessing efficacy of artemisinin as a treatment for macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion. The methodological qualities, including the risk of bias, will be evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, while confidence in the cumulative evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required, as this study is based on the review of published research. This review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated both electronically and in print. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: The protocol for this systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO under the number CRD42019131408.

Indexed as

Meta-Analysis as TopicReview Literature as TopicArtemisininsHumansMacular EdemaResearchRetinal Vein OcclusionArtemisinins

Identifiers

PMID31232939
PMCPMC6636968
OpenAlexW2950141143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.