Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31232687›Full record

ArticleeLife2019

Improved CUT&RUN chromatin profiling tools.

Michael P Meers, Terri D Bryson, Jorja G Henikoff, Steven Henikoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 341 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
341citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

341 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Inferring Gene Regulatory Networks in Stem Cells: Methods and Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Advances in mutant characterization for detecting causal mutations in crop plants.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

281 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael P MeersBasic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States.
Terri D BrysonBasic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States.
Jorja G HenikoffBasic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States.
Steven HenikoffBasic Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7621-8685

Funding

Epigenomic profiling of complex tissues with single-cell CUT&RUNR01HG010492 · NHGRI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI HENIKOFF, STEVEN · 2019 to 2023
$3.5M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010492NIH HHS 4DN TCPA A093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previously, we described a novel alternative to chromatin immunoprecipitation, CUT&RUN, in which unfixed permeabilized cells are incubated with antibody, followed by binding of a protein A-Micrococcal Nuclease (pA/MNase) fusion protein (Skene and Henikoff, 2017). Here we introduce three enhancements to CUT&RUN: A hybrid protein A-Protein G-MNase construct that expands antibody compatibility and simplifies purification, a modified digestion protocol that inhibits premature release of the nuclease-bound complex, and a calibration strategy based on carry-over of

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsChromatinEpigenesis, GeneticImmunologic TechniquesMicrococcal NucleaseMolecular BiologyRecombinant Fusion ProteinsStaphylococcal Protein ABacterial ProteinsChromatinIgG Fc-binding protein, StreptococcusMicrococcal NucleaseRecombinant Fusion ProteinsStaphylococcal Protein Achromatinchromosomesepigenomicsgene expressiongeneticsgenomicshumanspike-in calibration

Identifiers

PMID31232687
PMCPMC6598765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.