Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31232671›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2019

Validity of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sexual Interest and Satisfaction Measures in Men Following Radical Prostatectomy.

Nnenaya Q Agochukwu, Daniela Wittmann, Nicholas R Boileau, Rodney L Dunn, James E Montie, Tae Kim, David C Miller, James Peabody, Noelle E Carlozzi, Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Reply to K.P. Weinfurt et al.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Article
  12. Reply to K.P. Weinfurt et al.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Article
  13. Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Low Bar.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nnenaya Q Agochukwu1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Daniela Wittmann1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Nicholas R Boileau2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Rodney L Dunn1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
James E Montie1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
Tae Kim1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
David C Miller1University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI.
James Peabody3Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI.
Noelle E Carlozzi2University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative

Funding

University of Michigan UroEPI Career Development ProgramK12DK111011 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CLEMENS, J. QUENTIN, SARMA, ARUNA V · 2016 to 2025
$3.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS K12 DK111011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatient-reported outcomes after radical prostatectomy have focused on erectile function. To date, no studies have validated the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Sexual Interest and Satisfaction single item measures in patients with prostate cancer, nor have studies examined how these measures relate to erectile function. In addition, data are lacking with regard to the clinical responsiveness of these measures to treatment. We sought to validate and examine the clinical utility of these measures in men after radical prostatectomy. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe identified men who underwent a robotic radical prostatectomy from May 2014 to January 2016 in the Michigan Urological Surgery Improvement Collaborative. A single item from the PROMIS Global Satisfaction With Sex Life subdomain and a single item from the PROMIS Interest in Sexual Activity subdomain were administered. Erectile function was also assessed. Differences between baseline and 24-month T-scores for both PROMIS interest and satisfaction were examined. Multilevel models were constructed to examine change over time.

resultsA total of 1,604 patients were included in the analysis. Convergent and discriminant validity of the PROMIS measures was supported. The mean PROMIS interest T-score decreased significantly from baseline to 3 months (

conclusionPROMIS Global Satisfaction With Sex Life and Interest in Sexual Activity single-item measures are fundamental measures in prostate cancer survivorship. Patients are interested in sex despite functional losses and can salvage satisfaction, thereby giving insight into attainable patient-centered survivorship goals for sexual recovery after radical prostatectomy.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonal SatisfactionProstatectomyQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSexual Behavior

Identifiers

PMID31232671
PMCPMC7351343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.