Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31232512›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2020

The cost of improving nutritional outcomes through food-assisted maternal and child health and nutrition programmes in Burundi and Guatemala.

Jessica Heckert, Jef L Leroy, Deanna K Olney, Susan Richter, Elyse Iruhiriye, Marie T Ruel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica HeckertPoverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0002-3022-8298
Jef L LeroyPoverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0001-9371-3832
Deanna K OlneyPoverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0002-2420-8565
Susan RichterMichigan State University, work conducted while affiliated with Poverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0001-5871-7264
Elyse IruhiriyePoverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
Marie T RuelPoverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0002-9506-348X
International Food Policy Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence on the cost-effectiveness of multisectoral maternal and child health and nutrition programmes is scarce. We conducted a prospective costing study of two food-assisted maternal and child health and nutrition programmes targeted to pregnant women and children during the first 1,000 days (pregnancy to 2 years). Each was paired with a cluster-randomized controlled trial to evaluate impact and compare the optimal quantity and composition of food rations (Guatemala, five treatment arms) and their optimal timing and duration (Burundi, three treatment arms). We calculated the total and per beneficiary cost, conducted cost consequence analyses, and estimated the cost savings from extending the programme for 2 years. In Guatemala, the programme model with the lowest cost per percentage point reduction in stunting provided the full-size family ration with an individual ration of corn-soy blend or micronutrient powder. Reducing family ration size lowered costs but failed to reduce stunting. In Burundi, providing food assistance for the full 1,000 days led to the lowest cost per percentage point reduction in stunting. Reducing the duration of ration eligibility reduced per beneficiary costs but was less effective. A 2-year extension could have saved 11% per beneficiary in Guatemala and 18% in Burundi. We found that investments in multisectoral nutrition programmes do not scale linearly. Programmes providing smaller rations or rations for shorter durations, although less expensive per beneficiary, may not provide the necessary dose to improve (biological) outcomes. Lastly, delivering effective programmes for longer periods can generate cost savings by dispersing start-up costs and lengthening peak operating capacity.

Indexed as

Costs and Cost AnalysisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBurundiFemaleFood AssistanceGuatemalaHumansInfantMaternal-Child Health ServicesPregnancyProgram EvaluationProspective StudiesBurundicost-effectivenessfood aidGuatemalamaternal and child health and nutrition programmesmultisectoral nutrition programmes

Identifiers

PMID31232512
PMCPMC7038902
OpenAlexW2955084136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.