Reply to letter: Reversibility of hypertension-induced subclinical vascular changes: Do the new ACC/AHA 2017 blood pressure guidelines and heart rate changes make a difference?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Enhancing selection of alcohol consumption-associated genes by random forest.The British journal of nutrition · 2024
   Article
2. Influence of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on reversibility of alterations in arterial wall and cognitive performance associated with early hypertension: A follow-up study.Medicine · 2019
   Observational

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Hypertension-induced subclinical vascular and cognitive changes are reversible-An observational cohort study.2019
• Comment on
  Reversibility of hypertension-induced subclinical vascular changes: Do the new ACC/AHA 2017 blood pressure guidelines and heart rate changes make a difference?2019

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as