Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31232464›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pathology2019

Molecular pathology of the luminal class of urothelial tumors.

Carina Bernardo, Pontus Eriksson, Nour-Al-Dain Marzouka, Fredrik Liedberg, Gottfrid Sjödahl, Mattias Höglund

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Similar genetic profile in early and late stage urothelial tract cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Immunohistochemical Assays for Bladder Cancer Molecular Subtyping: Optimizing Parsimony and Performance of Lund Taxonomy Classifiers.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carina BernardoDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Pontus ErikssonDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Nour-Al-Dain MarzoukaDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik LiedbergDivision of Urological Research, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Gottfrid SjödahlDivision of Urological Research, Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7869-0473
Mattias HöglundDivision of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9283-4421
Lund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular subtypes of urothelial carcinoma may be divided into luminal and nonluminal tumors. Nonluminal tumors are composed of cases with basal/squamous-like or small cell/neuroendocrine features, with a consensus on the molecular characteristics of the respective subtype. In contrast, luminal tumors are more disparate with three to five suggested subtypes and with definitions that do not always cohere. To resolve some of these disparities we assembled a cohort of 344 luminal tumors classified as urothelial-like (Uro), with the subtypes UroA, UroAp, UroB, and UroC, or genomically unstable (GU) according to the LundTax system. Cases were systematically analyzed by immunohistochemistry using antibodies for proteins representing important biological processes or cellular states: KRT5, EGFR, and CDH3 for the integrity of a basal cell layer; CCNB1, Ki67, and FOXM1 for proliferation; FGFR3 and ERBB2 for receptor tyrosine kinase status; CCND1, CDKN2A(p16), RB1, and E2F3 for cell cycle regulation; PPARG, GATA3, and TP63 for the differentiation regulatory system; and KRT20 and UPK3 for the differentiation readout. We show that Uro tumors form one, albeit heterogenous, group characterized by FGFR3, CCND1, and RB1 expression, but low or absence of CDKN2A(p16) and ERBB2 expression. The opposite expression pattern is observed in GU cases. Furthermore, Uro tumors are distinguished from GU tumors by showing a high RB1/p16 expression ratio. Class defining characteristics were independent of pathological stage and growth pattern, and thus intrinsic. In Uro tumors, proliferation was limited to a well-defined single layer of basal-like cells in UroA tumors but occurred throughout the tumor parenchyma, independent of the basal layer, in the more progressed UroAp and UroC tumors. A similar change in proliferation topology was not observed in GU. We conclude that luminal urothelial carcinomas consist, at the molecular pathology level, of two major subtypes, the larger heterogenous Uro and the biologically distinct GU subtype. © 2019 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinomaCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationHumansImmunohistochemistryNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsUrotheliumBiomarkers, Tumorbladder cancerimmunohistochemistrymolecular subtypestumor classification

Identifiers

PMID31232464
PMCPMC6851980
OpenAlexW2953107254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.