ArticleClinical obesity2019
Development and outcomes of an immersive obesity summit workshop for medical resident and fellow education.
Article in Clinical obesity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building an Obesity Medicine Workforce: Implementation of a Comprehensive Resident Training Pathway in an Underserved Care Environment.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026Article
- An obesity medicine curriculum increases the obesity care self-efficacy of internal medicine residents in the primary care setting.Clinical obesity · 2024Article
- Surveying the Knowledge and Practices of Primary Care Residents in Managing Adult Patients with Obesity.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- A scoping review of obesity education interventions for current and prospective medical professionals in Canada.Obesity pillars · 2023Article
- Team-Based Learning Intervention to Improve Obesity Education in Medical School.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2023Article
- Development and outcomes of an immersive obesity summit workshop for medical resident and fellow education.Clinical obesity · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physicians need better training to manage patients with obesity. Our study capitalized on the intimate nature of an extracurricular obesity workshop, creating an interactive educational programme. We assessed the short- and long-term impact of the workshop on trainees' knowledge, competence and confidence in caring for patients with obesity in an outpatient setting. This is a cross-sectional study, involving regionally diverse mix of resident and fellow physicians. A live 2.5-day continuing medical education summit was held 11 to 13 March 2016. Obesity-related topics were reviewed using state-of-the art pedagogical techniques. Pre-/post-levels of knowledge, competence and clinical practice strategies were analysed. Sixty-three candidates interested in additional obesity medicine training were nominated by US residency and fellowship programme directors and selected to attend the summit. On average, learners experienced a 110% relative increase in knowledge and competence. The overall effect size was 0.95, with participants being ~54% more knowledgeable about the management of patients with obesity. All participants self-reported that this activity increased their knowledge about the subject matter, improving their performance in caring for patients when asked about their practice in a follow-up survey 6 months following the workshop. This immersive summit promoted robust gains in knowledge and confidence, ultimately translating to reported practice improvements at the individual and health system levels. Future research is warranted on the sustainability of gained skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.