ArticleBritish journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)2019
Towards a 'manifesto' for super-recognizer research.
Article in British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Super-Recognizers, or Su-Perceivers? Insights from fast periodic visual stimulation (FPVS) EEG.Brain topography · 2025Article
- Investigating the stability of individual differences in face recognition behavior.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- This condition impacts every aspect of my life: A survey to understand the experience of living with developmental prosopagnosia.PloS one · 2025Article
- Super recognizers: Increased sensitivity or reduced biases? Insights from serial dependence.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Face processing in police service: the relationship between laboratory-based assessment of face processing abilities and performance in a real-world identity matching task.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2021Article
- When experience does not promote expertise: security professionals fail to detect low prevalence fake IDs.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2021Article
- Differences between and within individuals, and subprocesses of face cognition: implications for theory, research and personnel selection.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Normative data for two challenging tests of face matching under ecological conditions.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article provides a response to five excellent commentaries on our article 'Super-recognizers: From the lab to the world and back again'. Specifically, the response summarizes commonalities between these commentaries. Based on this consensus, we propose a flexible framework for the assessment of superior face recognition and outline guiding principles to advance future work in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.