Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31231762›Full record

ArticleDNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes2019

Developmental atlas of the RNA editome in Sus scrofa skeletal muscle.

Yalan Yang, Min Zhu, Xinhao Fan, Yilong Yao, Junyu Yan, Yijie Tang, Siyuan Liu, Kui Li, Zhonglin Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yalan YangResearch Center for Animal Nutriomics at Shenzhen, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Min ZhuResearch Center for Animal Nutriomics at Shenzhen, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Xinhao FanResearch Center for Animal Nutriomics at Shenzhen, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yilong YaoResearch Center for Animal Nutriomics at Shenzhen, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Junyu YanResearch Center for Animal Nutriomics at Shenzhen, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yijie TangResearch Center for Animal Nutriomics at Shenzhen, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Siyuan LiuResearch Center for Animal Nutriomics at Shenzhen, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Kui LiInstitute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhonglin TangResearch Center for Animal Nutriomics at Shenzhen, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen · CNChinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing meditated by adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) enzymes is a widespread post-transcriptional event in mammals. However, A-to-I editing in skeletal muscle remains poorly understood. By integrating strand-specific RNA-seq, whole genome bisulphite sequencing, and genome sequencing data, we comprehensively profiled the A-to-I editome in developing skeletal muscles across 27 prenatal and postnatal stages in pig, an important farm animal and biomedical model. We detected 198,892 A-to-I editing sites and found that they occurred more frequently at prenatal stages and showed low conservation among pig, human, and mouse. Both the editing level and frequency decreased during development and were positively correlated with ADAR enzymes expression. The hyper-edited genes were functionally related to the cell cycle and cell division. A co-editing module associated with myogenesis was identified. The developmentally differential editing sites were functionally enriched in genes associated with muscle development, their editing levels were highly correlated with expression of their host mRNAs, and they potentially influenced the gain/loss of miRNA binding sites. Finally, we developed a database to visualize the Sus scrofa RNA editome. Our study presents the first profile of the dynamic A-to-I editome in developing animal skeletal muscle and provides evidences that RNA editing is a vital regulator of myogenesis.

Indexed as

RNA EditingAdenosine DeaminaseAnimalsDatabases, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMaleMuscle, SkeletalRNA, MessengerSequence Analysis, RNASus scrofaWhole Genome SequencingAdenosine DeaminaseRNA, MessengerdevelopmentpigRNA editingskeletal muscletranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID31231762
PMCPMC6589548
OpenAlexW2941099111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.