Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31231613›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2019

Laser Capture Microdissection and RNA-Seq Analysis: High Sensitivity Approaches to Explain Histopathological Heterogeneity in Human Glioblastoma FFPE Archived Tissues.

Prospero Civita, Sara Franceschi, Paolo Aretini, Valerio Ortenzi, Michele Menicagli, Francesca Lessi, Francesco Pasqualetti, Antonio Giuseppe Naccarato, Chiara Maria Mazzanti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Raman cell sorting for single-cell research.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  16. Promise of spatially resolved omics for tumor research.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023
    Review
  17. Dissecting the brain with spatially resolved multi-omics.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2023
    Review
  18. Application of spatial transcriptome technologies to neurological diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Prospero CivitaFondazione Pisana per la Scienza ONLUS, Pisa, Italy.
Sara FranceschiFondazione Pisana per la Scienza ONLUS, Pisa, Italy.
Paolo AretiniFondazione Pisana per la Scienza ONLUS, Pisa, Italy.
Valerio OrtenziDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Michele MenicagliFondazione Pisana per la Scienza ONLUS, Pisa, Italy.
Francesca LessiFondazione Pisana per la Scienza ONLUS, Pisa, Italy.
Francesco PasqualettiRadiation Oncology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Antonio Giuseppe NaccaratoDepartment of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Chiara Maria MazzantiFondazione Pisana per la Scienza ONLUS, Pisa, Italy.
Fondazione Pisa · ITInternational Flame Research Foundation · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser capture microdissection (LCM) coupled with RNA-seq is a powerful tool to identify genes that are differentially expressed in specific histological tumor subtypes. To better understand the role of single tumor cell populations in the complex heterogeneity of glioblastoma, we paired microdissection and NGS technology to study intra-tumoral differences into specific histological regions and cells of human GBM FFPE tumors. We here isolated astrocytes, neurons and endothelial cells in 6 different histological contexts: tumor core astrocytes, pseudopalisading astrocytes, perineuronal astrocytes in satellitosis, neurons with satellitosis, tumor blood vessels, and normal blood vessels. A customized protocol was developed for RNA amplification, library construction, and whole transcriptome analysis of each single portion. We first validated our protocol comparing the obtained RNA expression pattern with the gene expression levels of RNA-seq raw data experiments from the BioProject NCBI database, using Spearman's correlation coefficients calculation. We found a good concordance for pseudopalisading and tumor core astrocytes compartments (0.5 Spearman correlation) and a high concordance for perineuronal astrocytes, neurons, normal, and tumor endothelial cells compartments (0.7 Spearman correlation). Then, Principal Component Analysis and differential expression analysis were employed to find differences between tumor compartments and control tissue and between same cell types into distinct tumor contexts. Data consistent with the literature emerged, in which multiple therapeutic targets significant for glioblastoma (such as Integrins, Extracellular Matrix, transmembrane transport, and metabolic processes) play a fundamental role in the disease progression. Moreover, specific cellular processes have been associated with certain cellular subtypes within the tumor. Our results are promising and suggest a compelling method for studying glioblastoma heterogeneity in FFPE samples and its application in both prospective and retrospective studies.

Indexed as

glioblastomaLCMmicroenvironmentRNA-seqtumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID31231613
PMCPMC6568189
OpenAlexW2965275351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.