ReviewF1000Research2019
Progress in perceptual research: the case of prosopagnosia.
Review in F1000Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Functional resilience of the neural visual recognition system post-pediatric occipitotemporal resection.iScience · 2024Article
- Functional Resilience of the Neural Visual Recognition System Post-Pediatric Occipitotemporal Resection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- A new approach to diagnosing and researching developmental prosopagnosia: Excluded cases are impaired too.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- Differential functional reorganization of ventral and dorsal visual pathways following childhood hemispherectomy.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2023Article
- Differential functional reorganization of ventral and dorsal visual pathways following childhood hemispherectomy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Prosopagnosia, Other Specific Cognitive Deficits, and Behavioral Symptoms: Comparison between Right Temporal and Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- With childhood hemispherectomy, one hemisphere can support-but is suboptimal for-word and face recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Comparing the sensitivity of face matching assessments to detect face perception impairments.Neuropsychologia · 2021Article
- Neural network modeling of altered facial expression recognition in autism spectrum disorders based on predictive processing framework.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Face Processing in Developmental Prosopagnosia: Altered Neural Representations in the Fusiform Face Area.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
- Delayed diagnosis of prosopagnosia following a hemorrhagic stroke in an elderly man: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- Mirrored brain organization: Statistical anomaly or reversal of hemispheric functional segregation bias?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prosopagnosia is an impairment in the ability to recognize faces and can be acquired after a brain lesion or occur as a developmental variant. Studies of prosopagnosia make important contributions to our understanding of face processing and object recognition in the human visual system. We review four areas of advances in the study of this condition in recent years. First are issues surrounding the diagnosis of prosopagnosia, including the development and evaluation of newer tests and proposals for diagnostic criteria, especially for the developmental variant. Second are studies of the structural basis of prosopagnosia, including the application of more advanced neuroimaging techniques in studies of the developmental variant. Third are issues concerning the face specificity of the defect in prosopagnosia, namely whether other object processing is affected to some degree and in particular the status of visual word processing in light of recent predictions from the "many-to-many hypothesis". Finally, there have been recent rehabilitative trials of perceptual learning applied to larger groups of prosopagnosic subjects that show that face impairments are not immutable in this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.