Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31231340›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

Diatom-Bacteria Interactions Modulate the Composition and Productivity of Benthic Diatom Biofilms.

Coco Koedooder, Willem Stock, Anne Willems, Sven Mangelinckx, Marleen De Troch, Wim Vyverman, Koen Sabbe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The genome of Pleurosigma provides insights into the evolutionary adaptations of pelagic diatoms.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Coco KoedooderLaboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Willem StockLaboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Anne WillemsLaboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sven MangelinckxSynBioC Research Group, Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Marleen De TrochMarine Biology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Wim VyvermanLaboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Koen SabbeLaboratory of Protistology and Aquatic Ecology, Department of Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Benthic diatoms are dominant primary producers in intertidal mudflats and constitute a major source of organic carbon to consumers and decomposers residing within these ecosystems. They typically form biofilms whose species richness, community composition and productivity can vary in response to environmental drivers and their interactions with other organisms (e.g., grazers). Here, we investigated whether bacteria can affect diatom community composition and

Indexed as

algae-bacteria relationshipbiofilm interactionscross-kingdom interactionsdiversity–productivity relationshipmicrophytobenthos

Identifiers

PMID31231340
PMCPMC6561236
OpenAlexW2948973772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.