Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31231293›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2019

Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Movement Disorders: Current Concepts and Evidence-Based Strategies.

Thomas Koeglsperger, Carla Palleis, Franz Hell, Jan H Mehrkens, Kai Bötzel

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06239454 (Interleaving Stimulation Improves Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 118 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06239454 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Interleaving Stimulation Improves Dyskinesia in Parkinson's Disease: Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHuashan HospitalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsParkinson's DiseaseArmsinterleaving stimulation, empirical stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The Place of Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: Spatial before Temporal Optimization.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease: Navigating the Roadblocks to Clinical Implementation.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas KoeglspergerDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Carla PalleisDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Franz HellDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Jan H MehrkensDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Kai BötzelDepartment of Neurology, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become the treatment of choice for advanced stages of Parkinson's disease, medically intractable essential tremor, and complicated segmental and generalized dystonia. In addition to accurate electrode placement in the target area, effective programming of DBS devices is considered the most important factor for the individual outcome after DBS. Programming of the implanted pulse generator (IPG) is the only modifiable factor once DBS leads have been implanted and it becomes even more relevant in cases in which the electrodes are located at the border of the intended target structure and when side effects become challenging. At present, adjusting stimulation parameters depends to a large extent on personal experience. Based on a comprehensive literature search, we here summarize previous studies that examined the significance of distinct stimulation strategies for ameliorating disease signs and symptoms. We assess the effect of adjusting the stimulus amplitude (A), frequency (f), and pulse width (pw) on clinical symptoms and examine more recent techniques for modulating neuronal elements by electrical stimulation, such as interleaving (Medtronic®) or directional current steering (Boston Scientific®, Abbott®). We thus provide an evidence-based strategy for achieving the best clinical effect with different disorders and avoiding adverse effects in DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), the ventro-intermedius nucleus (VIM), and the globus pallidus internus (GPi).

Indexed as

DBS programming algorithmsDBS side effectssegmented electrodeshort pulse widthsubthalamic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID31231293
PMCPMC6558426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.