Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31231200›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in human neuroscience2019

Current State and Future Prospects of EEG and fNIRS in Robot-Assisted Gait Rehabilitation: A Brief Review.

Alisa Berger, Fabian Horst, Sophia Müller, Fabian Steinberg, Michael Doppelmayr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The evolution of neuromodulation for chronic stroke: From neuroplasticity mechanisms to brain-computer interfaces.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. fNIRS-EEG BCIs for Motor Rehabilitation: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Affective States and Virtual Reality to Improve Gait Rehabilitation: A Preliminary Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alisa BergerDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Fabian HorstDepartment of Training and Movement Science, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Sophia MüllerDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Fabian SteinbergDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Michael DoppelmayrDepartment of Sport Psychology, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait and balance impairments are frequently considered as the most significant concerns among individuals suffering from neurological diseases. Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) has shown to be a promising neurorehabilitation intervention to improve gait recovery in patients following stroke or brain injury by potentially initiating neuroplastic changes. However, the neurophysiological processes underlying gait recovery through RAGT remain poorly understood. As non-invasive, portable neuroimaging techniques, electroencephalography (EEG) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) provide new insights regarding the neurophysiological processes occurring during RAGT by measuring different perspectives of brain activity. Due to spatial information about changes in cortical activation patterns and the rapid temporal resolution of bioelectrical changes, more features correlated with brain activation and connectivity can be identified when using fused EEG-fNIRS, thus leading to a detailed understanding of neurophysiological mechanisms underlying motor behavior and impairments due to neurological diseases. Therefore, multi-modal integrations of EEG-fNIRS appear promising for the characterization of neurovascular coupling in brain network dynamics induced by RAGT. In this brief review, we surveyed neuroimaging studies focusing specifically on robotic gait rehabilitation. While previous studies have examined either EEG or fNIRS with respect to RAGT, a multi-modal integration of both approaches is lacking. Based on comparable studies using fused EEG-fNIRS integrations either for guiding non-invasive brain stimulation or as part of brain-machine interface paradigms, the potential of this methodologically combined approach in RAGT is discussed. Future research directions and perspectives for targeted, individualized gait recovery that optimize the outcome and efficiency of RAGT in neurorehabilitation were further derived.

Indexed as

brain-machine interfacebrain stimulationelectroencephalographyfunctional near-infrared spectroscopymotor recoverymulti-modal approachneurorehabilitationrobot-assisted gait training

Identifiers

PMID31231200
PMCPMC6561323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.