ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019
How Do Price and Quantity Promotions Affect Hedonic Purchases? An ERPs Study.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Group identity modulates bidding behavior in repeated lottery contest: neural signatures from event-related potentials and electroencephalography oscillations.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- A systematic review of the prediction of consumer preference using EEG measures and machine-learning in neuromarketing research.Brain informatics · 2022Review
- The Effectiveness of Price Promotions in Purchasing Affordable Luxury Products: An Event-Related Potential Study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Is Distant Extension Always Upset? Neural Evidence of Empathy and Brand Association Affect Distant Extension Evaluation.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- To Each Their Own: The Impact of Regulatory Focus on Consumers' Response to Online Information Load.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- How does the use of simultaneous contrast illusion on product-background color combination nudge consumer behavior? A behavioral and event-related potential study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- How do extrinsic cues influence consumers' online hotel booking decisions? An event-related potential experiment.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- The Effect of Social Distance on Intertemporal Choice of Reward Processing: An Event-Related Potentials Study.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Neural Bases of Brand Reputation Effect on Extension Evaluation: An ERPs Study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- How Does Information Overload Affect Consumers' Online Decision Process? An Event-Related Potentials Study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- An Investigation of a Frontal Negative Slow Wave in a Virtual Hedonic Purchase Task.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Symbolic Product Superiority in the Neural Salience of Compensatory Consumption Behavior.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to consuming hedonic products unnecessary to basic well-being, consumers need justifications for pleasure. However, different justifications have differential influences in promoting hedonic purchases, such as price and quantity promotions (PP and QP), the difference being that the latter requires purchasing additional units to get the same discount as the former. In the present study, even-related potentials (ERPs) was applied to reveal the timing of brain activities to further understand how promotion information consisting of promotion type (PP and QP) and discount depth, deep and shallow discounts (DD and SD) on hedonic products was processed. Behaviorally, consumers were more willing to purchase items in PP and DD conditions than QP and SD conditions, respectively, and spent more time making final purchase decisions in QP and DD condition or PP and SD condition compared to PP and DD condition. Neurophysiologically, DD automatically recruited more attentional resources than SD and led to a higher P2 amplitude. QP and DD condition or PP and SD condition evoked a larger N2 amplitude and enhanced perceptual conflict compared to PP and DD condition. During late stage, PP and DD elicited a more positive LPP amplitude in contrast to QP and SD, respectively, indicating that people have stronger purchase intention and positive affect in PP and DD contexts. These findings provided evidence for the differential influences between PP and QP and what ultimately made consumers buy hedonic products or not.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.