Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31231143›Full record

ArticleAnnals of statistics2019

A ROBUST AND EFFICIENT APPROACH TO CAUSAL INFERENCE BASED ON SPARSE SUFFICIENT DIMENSION REDUCTION.

Shujie Ma, Liping Zhu, Zhiwei Zhang, Chih-Ling Tsai, Raymond J Carroll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of statistics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Causal Inference With Outcome-Dependent Missingness And Self-Censoring.Proceedings of machine learning research · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shujie MaDEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92521, USA.
Liping ZhuCENTER FOR APPLIED STATISTICS, INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS AND BIG DATA, RENMIN UNIVERSITY OF CHINA, BEIJING 100872, CHINA.
Zhiwei ZhangDEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE, RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92521, USA.
Chih-Ling TsaiGRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS, DAVIS, CALIFORNIA 95616, USA.
Raymond J CarrollDEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS, TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS 77843, USA.

Funding

Measurement Error, Nutrition, Physical Activity and CancerU01CA057030 · NCI · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI CARROLL, RAYMOND J. · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
Statistical Methods to Assess Early Life Environmental Exposures on Child HealthR01ES024732 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SONG, PETER XUEKUN · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA057030NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES024732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fundamental assumption used in causal inference with observational data is that treatment assignment is ignorable given measured confounding variables. This assumption of no missing confounders is plausible if a large number of baseline covariates are included in the analysis, as we often have no prior knowledge of which variables can be important confounders. Thus, estimation of treatment effects with a large number of covariates has received considerable attention in recent years. Most existing methods require specifying certain parametric models involving the outcome, treatment and confounding variables, and employ a variable selection procedure to identify confounders. However, selection of a proper set of confounders depends on correct specification of the working models. The bias due to model misspecification and incorrect selection of confounding variables can yield misleading results. We propose a robust and efficient approach for inference about the average treatment effect via a flexible modeling strategy incorporating penalized variable selection. Specifically, we consider an estimator constructed based on an efficient influence function that involves a propensity score and an outcome regression. We then propose a new sparse sufficient dimension reduction method to estimate these two functions without making restrictive parametric modeling assumptions. The proposed estimator of the average treatment effect is asymptotically normal and semiparametrically efficient without the need for variable selection consistency. The proposed methods are illustrated via simulation studies and a biomedical application.

Indexed as

Average treatment effectdimension reductionhigh-dimensional datamultiple-index modeloutcome regressionPrimary 62G08secondary 62G10, 62G20, 62J07semiparametric efficiency

Identifiers

PMID31231143
PMCPMC6588012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.