Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31231125›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2019

E-cadherin clone 36 nuclear staining dictates adverse disease outcome in lobular breast cancer patients.

João Lobo, Sara Petronilho, Amy Hanlon Newell, Julia Coach, Greg Harlow, Andréia Cruz, Paula Lopes, Luís Antunes, Isaac Bai, Espen Walker and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Results of a worldwide survey on the currently used histopathological diagnostic criteria for invasive lobular breast cancer.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

João LoboDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), Rua. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6829-1391
Sara PetronilhoDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), Rua. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
Amy Hanlon NewellVentana Medical Systems, a member of the Roche Group, 1910 E Innovation Park Dr., Tucson, AZ, 85755, USA.
Julia CoachVentana Medical Systems, a member of the Roche Group, 1910 E Innovation Park Dr., Tucson, AZ, 85755, USA.
Greg HarlowVentana Medical Systems, a member of the Roche Group, 1910 E Innovation Park Dr., Tucson, AZ, 85755, USA.
Andréia CruzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
Paula LopesDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), Rua. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.
Luís AntunesDepartment of Epidemiology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), Rua Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3098-0711
Isaac BaiVentana Medical Systems, a member of the Roche Group, 1910 E Innovation Park Dr., Tucson, AZ, 85755, USA.
Espen WalkerVentana Medical Systems, a member of the Roche Group, 1910 E Innovation Park Dr., Tucson, AZ, 85755, USA.
Rui HenriqueDepartment of Pathology, Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPOP), Rua. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, 4200-072, Porto, Portugal. henrique@ipoporto.min-saude.pt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3171-4666

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease and additional biomarkers for individually predicting patient outcomes are needed. Aberrant membrane E-cadherin immunoexpression has been demonstrated in lobular breast cancer. Also, E-cadherin nuclear staining has been reported, associating with prognosis in various tumors. Here, we explore whether membrane or nuclear staining of E-cadherin has the potential to dictate prognosis of patients with lobular breast cancer. We selected a cohort of 285 consecutively diagnosed lobular breast cancer patients and performed immunohistochemistry for E-cadherin (clones 36, EP700Y, and NCH38) and P-cadherin (clone 56C1) in representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks. All patients were female, HER2-negative and surgically treated in a single institution. Survival curves were computed by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Hazard ratios and respective 95% confidence intervals were estimated using Cox regression models. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Nuclear staining for E-cadherin clone 36 was frequent (35%), contrarily to other antibodies tested. Negative correlation was found between nuclear and membrane E-cadherin clone 36 immunostaining (r

Indexed as

AgedAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCadherinsCarcinoma, LobularCell NucleusFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAntigens, CDBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsCDH1 protein, human

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.