Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31230883›Full record

ReviewVaccine2019

Role of antigen specific T and B cells in systemic and mucosal immune responses in ETEC and Shigella infections, and their potential to serve as correlates of protection in vaccine development.

Sachin Mani, Franklin R Toapanta, Monica A McArthur, Firdausi Qadri, Ann-Mari Svennerholm, Bert Devriendt, Armelle Phalipon, Daniel Cohen, Marcelo B Sztein

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vaccine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Confronting challenges to enterotoxigenicFrontiers in tropical diseases · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sachin ManiPATH, Washington, DC, United States. Electronic address: sach.mani@gmail.com.
Franklin R ToapantaCenter for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Monica A McArthurCenter for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Firdausi QadriInfectious Diseases Division, International Center for Diarrheal Diseases Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ann-Mari SvennerholmDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Bert DevriendtFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Virology, Parasitology, and Immunology, Ghent University, Belgium.
Armelle PhaliponMolecular Microbial Pathogenesis, INSERM U1202, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Daniel CohenSchool of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
Marcelo B SzteinCenter for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States. Electronic address: msztein@som.umaryland.edu.

Funding

Wild-type S. typhi Infection in Humans: Integrated Immunoprotective MechanismsU19AI082655 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SZTEIN, MARCELO B. · 2009 to 2018
$27.8M
Shigella Live Vector-Based Multivalent VaccineU19AI109776 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LEVINE, MYRON MAX · 2014 to 2018
$25.4M
IMMUNE MECHANISMS OF PROTECTION IN S TYPHI VACCINESR01AI036525 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI Marcelo B. Sztein · 1994 to 2026
$12.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI036525NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082655NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI109776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The generation of robust systemic and mucosal antibody and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses that are protective, long-lasting, and can quickly be recalled upon subsequent re-exposure to the cognate antigen is the key to the development of effective vaccine candidates. These responses, whether they represent mechanistic or non-mechanistic immunological correlates of protection, usually entail the activation of T cell memory and effector subsets (T-CMI) and induction of long-lasting memory B cells. However, for ETEC and Shigella, the precise role of these key immune cells in primary and secondary (anamnestic) immune responses remains ill-defined. A workshop to address immune correlates for ETEC and Shigella, in general, and to elucidate the mechanistic role of T-cell subsets and B-cells, both systemically and in the mucosal microenvironment, in the development of durable protective immunity against ETEC and Shigella was held at the recent 2nd Vaccines against Shigella and ETEC (VASE) conference in June 2018. This report is a summary of the presentations and the discussion that ensued at the workshop.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialB-LymphocytesClinical Trials as TopicCongresses as TopicDiarrheaDysentery, BacillaryEnterotoxigenic Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli VaccinesHumansImmunity, CellularImmunity, MucosalImmunizationImmunogenicity, VaccineImmunologic MemoryShigellaAntibodies, BacterialEscherichia coli VaccinesShigella VaccinesB cellsCorrelates of protection (CoP)Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC)IgAIgGImmunocorrelateMucosal antibodiesShigellaT cells

Identifiers

PMID31230883
PMCPMC7413037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.