Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31230825›Full record

Trial reportThe Canadian journal of cardiology2019

Spironolactone in Acute Heart Failure Patients With Renal Dysfunction and Risk Factors for Diuretic Resistance: From the ATHENA-HF Trial.

Stephen J Greene, G Michael Felker, Anna Giczewska, Andreas P Kalogeropoulos, Andrew P Ambrosy, Hrishikesh Chakraborty, Adam D DeVore, Marat Fudim, Steven E McNulty, Robert J Mentz and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Canadian journal of cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Evolving Decongestion Strategies in the Management of Acute Heart Failure.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen J GreeneDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA. Electronic address: stephen.greene@duke.edu.
G Michael FelkerDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Anna GiczewskaDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics, Gdansk University of Technology, Gdansk, Poland.
Andreas P KalogeropoulosDivision of Cardiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Andrew P AmbrosyDepartment of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, California, USA.
Hrishikesh ChakrabortyDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Adam D DeVoreDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Marat FudimDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Steven E McNultyDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Robert J MentzDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Muthiah VaduganathanBrigham and Women's Hospital Heart & Vascular Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Adrian F HernandezDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Javed ButlerDepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi, USA.
Duke University · USClinical Research Institute · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USGdańsk University of Technology · PLKaiser Permanente · USStony Brook University · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

Heart Failure Clinical Research Network Coordinating CenterU10HL084904 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ANSTROM, KEVIN J, HERNANDEZ, ADRIAN · 2012 to 2018
$38.0M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR002548 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOMSEY, GRACE A · 2018 to 2022
$35.5M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCHT32HL007604 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI MARK W FEINBERG · 1985 to 2026
$19.0M
MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEART &VASCULAR DISEASEST32HL007101 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FREEDMAN, NEIL J. · 1985 to 2020
$9.8M
Postdoctoral Training in Cardiovascular Clinical ResearchT32HL069749 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2003 to 2023
$6.7M
Mayo Heart Failure Regional Clinical CenterU10HL110262 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI REDFIELD, MARGARET M · 2012 to 2018
$3.6M
Heart Failure Clinical Research Network Regional Clinical Center (U10)U10HL110312 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FELKER, GARY M · 2012 to 2018
$3.5M
SALsalate to Improve Exercise toleraNce and LVDD in T2dm-DHF (SALIENT-DHF trial)U10HL110309 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DAVILA-ROMAN, VICTOR G., MANN, DOUGLAS L · 2012 to 2018
$3.5M
Harvard Regional Clinical Center of the NHLBI Heart Failure NetworkU10HL110337 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GIVERTZ, MICHAEL M, LEWIS, GREGORY DYER · 2012 to 2018
$3.5M
Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Congestive Heart FailureU10HL110336 · NHLBI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI STARLING, RANDALL CARSON, TANG, WAI HONG WILSON · 2012 to 2018
$2.5M
Heart Failure Clinical Trials NetworkU10HL110302 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, ANDREW · 2012 to 2018
$2.5M
Mid Atlantic Heart Failure NetworkU10HL110338 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CAPPOLA, THOMAS P., MARGULIES, KENNETH BER · 2012 to 2018
$2.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002548NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007101NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007604NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069749NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL084904NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL110262NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL110297NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL110302NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL110309NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL110312NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL110336NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL110337NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL110338NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL110342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute heart failure (HF) patients with renal insufficiency and risk factors for diuretic resistance may be most likely to derive incremental improvement in congestion with the addition of spironolactone.

methodsThe Aldosterone Targeted Neurohormonal Combined with Natriuresis Therapy in Heart Failure (ATHENA-HF) trial randomized 360 acute HF patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction to spironolactone 100 mg daily or usual care for 96 hours. The current analysis assessed the effects of study therapy within tertiles of baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and subgroups at heightened risk for diuretic resistance.

resultsAcross eGFR tertiles, there was no incremental benefit of high-dose spironolactone on any efficacy endpoint, including changes in log N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and signs and symptoms of congestion (all P for interaction ≥ 0.06). High-dose spironolactone had no significant effect on N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide reduction regardless of blood pressure, diabetes mellitus status, and loop diuretic dose (all P for interaction ≥ 0.38). In-hospital changes in serum potassium and creatinine were similar between treatment groups for all GFR tertiles (all P for interaction ≥ 0.18). Rates of inpatient worsening HF, 30-day worsening HF, and 60-day all-cause mortality were numerically higher among patients with lower baseline eGFR, but relative effects of study treatment did not differ with renal function (all P for interaction ≥ 0.27).

conclusionsHigh-dose spironolactone did not improve congestion over usual care among patients with acute HF, irrespective of renal function and risk factors for diuretic resistance. In-hospital initiation or continuation of spironolactone was safe during the inpatient stay, even when administered at high doses to patients with moderate renal dysfunction.

Indexed as

Drug ResistanceCreatinineDose-Response Relationship, DrugFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateHeart FailureHumansMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsProspective StudiesRenal InsufficiencyRisk FactorsSpironolactoneStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeCreatinineMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsSpironolactone

Identifiers

PMID31230825
PMCPMC6685766
OpenAlexW2911478519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.