Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31230606›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2020

Voltage-gated calcium channel blockers for psychiatric disorders: genomic reappraisal.

Paul J Harrison, Elizabeth M Tunbridge, Annette C Dolphin, Jeremy Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CaBritish journal of pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  8. New insights from the last decade of research in psychiatric genetics: discoveries, challenges and clinical implications.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023
    Article
  9. CACNA1C (CaNeuropharmacology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul J HarrisonProfessor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford; and Honorary Consultant Psychiatrist, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6719-1126
Elizabeth M TunbridgeAssociate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Annette C DolphinProfessor, Department of Neuroscience, Physiology, and Pharmacology, University College London, UK.
Jeremy HallProfessor, Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Unit, Cardiff University, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 206279/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We reappraise the psychiatric potential of calcium channel blockers (CCBs). First, voltage-gated calcium channels are risk genes for several disorders. Second, use of CCBs is associated with altered psychiatric risks and outcomes. Third, research shows there is an opportunity for brain-selective CCBs, which are better suited to psychiatric indications.

Indexed as

Calcium Channel BlockersMental DisordersCalcium ChannelsGenomicsHumansCalcium Channel BlockersCalcium Channelsbipolar affective disordersCalcium channelsnovel central nervous system drugspsychiatrytherapy

Identifiers

PMID31230606
PMCPMC7557861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.