Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31230508›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Impact of Sex on Ventricular-Vascular Stiffness and Long-Term Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: TOPCAT Trial Substudy.

Anna L Beale, Shane Nanayakkara, David M Kaye

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00094302 (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00094302 phase3completednot on this map

Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist (TOPCAT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorCarelon ResearchRan2006 to 2013Enrolled3,445ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Heart Failure, CongestiveArmsSpironolactone, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex differences in vascular function among individuals with heart failure: a systematic review.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sex Differences in Adiposity and Cardiovascular Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Sex and Gender Differences in Heart Failure.International journal of heart failure · 2020
    Review
  16. Obesity and cardiovascular disease in women.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna L Beale1 Department of Cardiology Alfred Hospital Melbourne Australia.
Shane Nanayakkara1 Department of Cardiology Alfred Hospital Melbourne Australia.
David M Kaye1 Department of Cardiology Alfred Hospital Melbourne Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Women have higher vascular stiffness with aging. The aim of this study was to characterize sex differences in vascular and ventricular structure and function, and to investigate the impact on the primary outcome in the TOPCAT trial (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure With an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial). Methods and Results Data from the Americas cohort of the TOPCAT trial were analyzed. Patients with echocardiography (n=654) were compared according to sex, and achievement of the primary end point (a composite of death from cardiovascular causes and heart failure hospitalization) assessed. Echocardiography revealed higher arterial, systolic, and diastolic ventricular elastance and worse ventricular-vascular coupling in women. Women had better overall survival and heart failure hospitalization outcomes (hazard ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.98, P=0.034), however, determinants of achievement of the primary outcome differed between the sexes. Pulse pressure was a key determinant of outcome in women (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1-1.09, P=0.034) whereas in men heart rate (hazard ratio 1.61, 95% CI 1.02-2.52 per 10 mm Hg increase, P=0.04) and B-type natriuretic peptide (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% CI 1-1.02 per 10 ng/mL increase P=0.02) were associated with poorer outcome. Conclusions Outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction appear to be differentially influenced by key physiological factors that vary according to sex. In women, ventricular-vascular stiffening was the most significant determinant of outcome, whereas in men overall survival was influenced by heart rate and B-type natriuretic peptide; this highlights key sex differences in the pathophysiology and outcomes of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and warrants further exploration. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00094302.

Indexed as

Blood PressureAgedAged, 80 and overEchocardiographyElasticityFemaleHeart FailureHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsSex FactorsMineralocorticoid Receptor AntagonistsNatriuretic Peptide, Brainhealth outcomesheart failurepulse pressuresex differences

Identifiers

PMID31230508
PMCPMC6662372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.