Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31230365›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2019

YY males of the dioecious plant Mercurialis annua are fully viable but produce largely infertile pollen.

Xinji Li, Paris Veltsos, Guillaume G Cossard, Jörn Gerchen, John R Pannell

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sex-allocation trade-offs and their genetic architecture revealed by experimental evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Recurrent allopolyploidization, Y-chromosome introgression and the evolution of sexual systems in the plant genusPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  4. The contributions of Nettie Stevens to the field of sex chromosome biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Xinji LiDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3019-5289
Paris VeltsosDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, 1001 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8872-6281
Guillaume G CossardIntegrative Biology of Marine Organisms Department, Station Biologique CNRS, Place Georges Teissier, Roscoff, 29688, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4633-5159
Jörn GerchenDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.
John R PannellDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-0098-7074
University of Lausanne · CHCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The suppression of recombination during sex-chromosome evolution is thought to be favoured by linkage between the sex-determining locus and sexually antagonistic loci, and leads to the degeneration of the chromosome restricted to the heterogametic sex. Despite substantial evidence for genetic degeneration at the sequence level, the phenotypic effects of the earliest stages of sex-chromosome evolution are poorly known. Here, we compare the morphology, viability and fertility between XY and YY individuals produced by crossing seed-producing males in the dioecious plant Mercurialis annua, which has young sex chromosomes with limited X-Y sequence divergence. We found no significant difference in viability or vegetative morphology between XY and YY males. However, electron microscopy revealed clear differences in pollen anatomy, and YY males were significantly poorer sires in competition with their XY counterparts. Our study suggests either that the X chromosome is required for full male fertility in M. annua, or that male fertility is sensitive to the dosage of relevant Y-linked genes. We discuss the possibility that the maintenance of male-fertility genes on the X chromosome might have been favoured in recent population expansions that selected for the ability of females to produce pollen in the absence of males.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, PlantEuphorbiaceaeGenotypeLinear ModelsPhenotypePlant InfertilityPollenSex ChromosomesinconstancyMercurialis annuaphenotypic traitssex-chromosome evolutionY degenerationYY males

Identifiers

PMID31230365
PMCPMC6852596
OpenAlexW2950408401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.