ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2020
Clinical and pathophysiological outcomes of the robotic-assisted Heller-Dor myotomy for achalasia: a single-center experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of robotic surgery on the treatment of benign esophageal and gastric disease: early experience of a specialized unit.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- SHORT AND LONG-TERM RESULTS OF LAPAROSCOPIC ESOPHAGOCARDIOMYOTOMY WITH FUNDOPLICATION (HELLER-PINOTTI SURGERY) IN THE TREATMENT OF NON-ADVANCED ACHALASIA (MEGAESOPHAGUS).Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2024Article
- Clinical and functional outcome following robotic Heller-myotomy with partial fundoplication in patients with achalasia.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Article
- Robotic Surgery for the Treatment of Achalasia Cardia: Surgical Technique, Initial Experiences and Literature Review.Cureus · 2022Article
- Complex Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.Gastro hep advances · 2022Review
- Robotic Heller-Dor for Idiopathic Achalasia: the Pisa experience.Updates in surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and Dor fundoplication is considered a safe and effective treatment for achalasia. Robotic-assisted Heller-Dor procedure (RAHD) has emerged as an alternative approach due to improved visualization and fine motor control. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate clinical, and functional results of RAHD. We evaluated a group of 66 patients with achalasia that underwent robotic-assisted Heller-Dor operation. Before treatment all patients underwent a diagnostic work-up such as upper endoscopy, esophageal barium swallow and high resolution manometry. The presence of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease was diagnosed by impedance and pH monitoring (MII-pH). Dysphagia improved in 92.4% of patients after treatment. Barium swallow series showed esophageal emptying in 100% of patients and a significant reduction of the esophageal diameter (p = 0.00235). Forty-five of 66 patients (68.2%) underwent upper endoscopy and 35 of 66 (53%) underwent MII-pH. Esophageal erosions were found in 4/45 (8,8%) and MII-pH showed abnormal results in 3/35 patients (8.6%). RAHD ensures a meticulous esophageal and gastric myotomy, allowing to visualize and divide each muscle fibers with a low rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications. resulting in turn in good clinical outcomes, radiological findings and functional results even if robotic tecnique definitely increases the surgical cost in the treatment of these functional esophageal disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.