ArticleIrish journal of medical science2020
Stature estimation from foot anthropometric measurements in Bangladeshi population.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated femoral measurement from postmortem computed tomographic images using artificial intelligence for forensic stature estimation in a Japanese population.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
- Stature estimation by semi-automatic measurements of 3D CT images of the femur.International journal of legal medicine · 2023Article
- Stature estimation using the odontometric measurements of the maxilla.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research · 2022Article
- Stature estimation from the hand dimensions in the Eastern Saudi Arabian adult male population.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022Article
- Stature estimation from footprint measurements in Bangladeshi adults.Forensic sciences research · 2022Article
- Stature estimation from handprint measurements: an application to the medicolegal investigation.Egyptian journal of forensic sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEstimating human stature is a major concern to formulate a biological profile which provides effective data for forensic identification. This research was aimed to generate a formula for estimating stature from human foot anthropometry.
methodsThis study was conducted in selected 150 male and 150 female subjects within the range of 18 to 60 years randomly. From each subject, stature and seven-foot measurements were taken by applying the standard technique. Stature was estimated from foot measurements by using linear and multiple regression equations.
resultsThe result showed that each foot measurement was significantly (p < 0.001) and positively correlated with stature. Bilateral difference among male and female was not significant (p < 0.05). Multiple regression models showed better accuracy in estimating stature than linear regression models.
conclusionIn conclusion, it can be said that human stature can be successfully estimated by using foot measurements which can be applied in forensic investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.