Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31230215›Full record

ReviewBiophysical reviews2019

Ultraviolet radiation sensors: a review.

Vangelis George Kanellis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biophysical reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. 2019-A year in Biophysical Reviews.Biophysical reviews · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vangelis George KanellisThe Canberra Hospital, Garran, Canberra, ACT, Australia. vangeliskanellis@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3043-8949

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of when to actively modify outdoor sun protective behaviour is crucial for sun safety and should be based upon personal susceptibility to sunburn and the intensity of the ultraviolet radiation dose during outdoor exposure. To facilitate measurements of dose and exposure, non-scientific and research-grade instruments measuring different exposure parameters of solar radiation are commercially available. These devices have been marketed as weather stations, purpose-built UVI display stations, portable dosimeters, handheld solarmeters, watches, and even stickers that can be worn. According to their measurements, the public can be educated and reminded to adopt appropriate sun safety practices such as limiting midday sun exposure, seeking shade, wearing protective clothing such as a broad-brimmed hat, and regularly applying and reapplying broad-spectrum sunscreen. There are many different commercial devices and smart phone applications (apps) that allow the public to be informed about current ultraviolet radiation levels in their immediate area, but each aims to enable the public to practise good sun safety behaviour. Naturally, each device is not without its various limitations and unique advantages. This study explores the ways in which ultraviolet radiation sensors can provide an accurate and highly convenient way of practising good sun safety behaviour in various contexts of high sun exposure such as playgrounds, tourist attractions, workplaces, and swimming pools. However, the author advises caution on the use of personal meters that have not been validated for their reliability and accuracy as public health tools.

Indexed as

CancerSafetySensorsSkinUltraviolet

Identifiers

PMID31230215
PMCPMC12443657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.