Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31230187›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2019

Microbiological safety of popular recreation swimming sites in Central California.

Xunde Li, Jennifer A Chase, Ronald F Bond, Panachon Lor, Kristine Fernandez, Trân H Nguyen, Melissa L Partyka, Anyarat Thiptara, Edward R Atwill

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Environmental Factors Associated withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Diverse Genotypes and Species ofMicroorganisms · 2021
    Article
  8. The Mucosal Innate Immune Response toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. PeerJ · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xunde LiDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, 4207 Vet Med 3B, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Jennifer A ChaseWestern Institute for Food Safety and Security, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Ronald F BondWestern Institute for Food Safety and Security, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Panachon LorWestern Institute for Food Safety and Security, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Kristine FernandezWestern Institute for Food Safety and Security, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Trân H NguyenWestern Institute for Food Safety and Security, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Melissa L PartykaSchool of Fisheries, Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.
Anyarat ThiptaraWestern Institute for Food Safety and Security, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Edward R AtwillDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California-Davis, 4207 Vet Med 3B, Davis, CA, 95616, USA. ratwill@ucdavis.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8664-5330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the study was to assess the microbiological safety of popular recreational swimming sites in Central California. Water samples were collected from eleven monitoring sites across the lower reaches of two watersheds for two consecutive swimming seasons (2012-2013), and levels of indicator and pathogenic microorganisms were determined. Data on ambient weather and water chemistry were collected for analyzing their associations with microorganisms in water. All water samples were positive for indicator E. coli with mean concentrations per site ranging from 3.07 to 216.11 MPN/100 ml in 2012 and 13.4 to 226.97 MPN/100 ml in 2013. Mean E. coli concentrations in 27% and 36% samplings sites exceeded the EPA 2012 Recreational Water Quality Criteria recommended mean concentration of ≤ 126 CFU/100 ml of E. coli, in 2012 and 2013, respectively. Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts were detected in all water samples from all sampling sites, with an overall prevalence of 50% and mean concentrations of 0.08 oocysts/l in 2012 and 0.19 oocysts/l in 2013. Giardia spp. cysts were detected at eight sites, with an overall prevalence of 28.8% and mean concentration of 0.2 cysts/l in both years. The majority of the detected Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts and Giardia spp. cysts appeared damaged under microscopy. E. coli O157:H7 was detected in 9% of water samples, with positive samples limited to three sites. Salmonella spp. were detected in all but one site across the two years, with mean concentrations of 0.94 MPN/l in 2012 and 1.85 MPN/l in 2013. Cryptosporidium spp. oocyst concentrations were negatively associated with 30-day mean wind speed and cumulative precipitation and dissolved oxygen in water. Giardia spp. cyst concentrations were positively associated with turbidity and pH of water and negatively associated with E. coli concentrations and 24-h mean air temperature. Salmonella spp. concentrations were positively associated with 30-day mean air temperature. The occurrence of E. coli O157:H7 was positively associated with previous 30-day cumulative precipitation.

Indexed as

Water QualityAnimalsCaliforniaCryptosporidiumEnvironmental MonitoringEscherichia coli O157GiardiaOocystsParks, RecreationalSalmonellaSeasonsSwimmingWaterWater MicrobiologyWeatherWaterCryptosporidiumE. coliE. coli O157GiardiaSalmonellaSwimWater quality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.