Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31230049›Full record

ArticleJournal of innate immunity2020

Men Have a Stronger Monocyte-Derived Cytokine Production Response upon Stimulation with the Gram-Negative Stimulus Lipopolysaccharide than Women: A Pooled Analysis Including 15 Study Populations.

Karel G M Beenakker, Rudi G J Westendorp, Anton J M de Craen, Sijia Chen, Yotam Raz, Bart E P B Ballieux, Rob G H H Nelissen, Alexander F L Later, Tom W Huizinga, Pieternella E Slagboom and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of innate immunity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Karel G M BeenakkerDepartment of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rudi G J WestendorpDepartment of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Anton J M de CraenDepartment of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sijia ChenDepartment of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Yotam RazDepartment of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bart E P B BallieuxDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Rob G H H NelissenDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alexander F L LaterDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Tom W HuizingaDepartment of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Pieternella E SlagboomDepartment of Medical Statistics, Molecular Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Dorret I BoomsmaDepartment of Biological Psychology, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Andrea B MaierDepartment of Medicine and Aged Care, @AgeMelbourne, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, a.b.maier@vu.nl.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity of Copenhagen · DKVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of bacterial infections and sepsis, as well as the mortality risk from sepsis, is sex specific. These clinical findings have been attributed to sex differences in immune responsiveness. The aim of the present study was to investigate sex differences in monocyte-derived cytokine production response upon stimulation with the gram-negative stimulus lipopolysaccharide (LPS) using cytokine data from 15 study populations. Individual data on ex vivo cytokine production response upon stimulation with LPS in whole blood were available for 4,020 subjects originating from these 15 study populations, either from the general population or from patient populations with specific diseases. Men had a stronger cytokine production response than women to LPS for tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-12, IL-1β, IL-1RA, and IL-10, but not for interferon-γ. The granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor production response was lower in men than in women. These sex differences were independent of chronological age. As men had higher monocyte concentrations, we normalized the cytokine production responses for monocyte concentration. After normalization, the sex differences in cytokine production response to LPS disappeared, except for IL-10, for which the production response was lower in men than in women. A sex-based approach to interpreting immune responsiveness is crucial.

Indexed as

Sex CharacteristicsAdultFemaleHumansLipopolysaccharidesMaleMiddle AgedMonocytesMonokinesLipopolysaccharidesMonokinesBloodCytokinesGenderInnate immunityLipopolysaccharideSex

Identifiers

PMID31230049
PMCPMC7098282
OpenAlexW2953366830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.