Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31230032›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Joint impact of dementia and frailty on healthcare utilisation and outcomes: a retrospective cohort study of long-stay home care recipients.

Colleen J Maxwell, Luke Mondor, David B Hogan, Michael A Campitelli, Susan E Bronskill, Dallas P Seitz, Walter P Wodchis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Colleen J MaxwellSchool of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Waterlo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7988-2899
Luke MondorICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David B HoganDivision of Geriatric Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Michael A CampitelliICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Susan E BronskillICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dallas P SeitzDivision of Geriatric Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Walter P WodchisInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-8447

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine the associations between dementia and 1-year health outcomes (urgent hospitalisation, long-term care (LTC) admission, mortality) among long-stay home care recipients and the extent to which these associations vary by clients' frailty level.

designA retrospective cohort study using linked clinical and health administrative databases.

settingHome care in Ontario, Canada.

participantsLong-stay (≥60 days) care clients (n=153 125) aged ≥50 years assessed between April 2014 and March 2015.

main outcome measuresDementia was ascertained with a validated administrative data algorithm and frailty with a 66-item frailty index (FI) based on a previously validated FI derived from the clinical assessment. We examined associations between dementia, FI and their interactions, with 1-year outcomes using multivariable Fine-Gray competing risk (urgent hospitalisation and LTC admission) and Cox proportional hazards (mortality) models.

resultsClients with dementia (vs without) were older (mean±SD, 83.3±7.9 vs 78.9±11.3 years, p<0.001) and more likely to be frail (30.3% vs 24.2%, p<0.001). In models adjusted for FI (as a continuous variable) and other confounders, clients with dementia showed a lower incidence of urgent hospitalisation (adjusted subdistribution HR (sHR)=0.84, 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.86) and mortality rate (adjusted HR=0.87, 95% CI: 0.84 to 0.89) but higher incidence of LTC admission (adjusted sHR=2.60, 95% CI: 2.53 to 2.67). The impact of dementia on LTC admission and mortality was significantly modified by clients' FI (p<0.001 interaction terms), showing a lower magnitude of association (ie, attenuated positive (for LTC admission) and negative (for mortality) association) with increasing frailty.

conclusionsThe strength of associations between dementia and LTC admission and death (but not urgent hospitalisation) among home care recipients was significantly modified by their frailty status. Understanding the public health impact of dementia requires consideration of frailty levels among older populations, including those with and without dementia and varying degrees of multimorbidity.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDementiaFemaleFrail ElderlyHome Care ServicesHospitalizationHumansLong-Term CareMaleOntarioPatient Acceptance of Health CareRetrospective Studiesdementiafrailtyhealth outcomeshome care

Identifiers

PMID31230032
PMCPMC6596979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.