Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31230013›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Here one year, gone the next? Investigating persistence of frequent emergency department attendance: a retrospective study in Australia.

Luise Lago, Victoria Westley-Wise, Judy Mullan, Kelly Lambert, Rebekah Zingel, Thomas Carrigan, Wayne Triner, Kathy Eagar

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Characteristics of High-Resource Health System Users in Rural and Remote Regions: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luise LagoCentre for Health Research Illawarra Shoalhaven Population, Faculty of Business, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8960-3032
Victoria Westley-WiseCentre for Health Research Illawarra Shoalhaven Population, Faculty of Business, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Judy MullanCentre for Health Research Illawarra Shoalhaven Population, Faculty of Business, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Kelly LambertCentre for Health Research Illawarra Shoalhaven Population, Faculty of Business, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Rebekah ZingelPlanning and Strategic Commissioning, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Thomas CarriganEmergency Medicine, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Wayne TrinerEmergency Medicine, Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Kathy EagarAustralian Health Services Research Institute, Faculty of Business, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatients are presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with increasing complexity at rates beyond population growth and ageing. Intervention studies target patients with 12 months or less of frequent attendance. However, these interventions are not well targeted since most patients do not remain frequent attenders. This paper quantifies temporary and ongoing frequent attendance and contrasts risk factors for each group.

designRetrospective population-based study using 10 years of longitudinal data.

settingAn Australian geographic region that includes metropolitan and rural EDs.

participants332 100 residents visited any ED during the study period.

main outcome measureFrequent attendance was defined as seven or more visits to any ED in the region within a 12-month period. Temporary frequent attendance was defined as meeting this threshold only once, and ongoing more than once. Risk factors for temporary and ongoing frequent attenders were identified using logistic regression models for adults and children.

resultsOf 8577 frequent attenders, 80.1% were temporary and 19.9% ongoing (12.9% repeat, 7.1% persistent). Among adults, ongoing were more likely than temporary frequent attenders to be young to middle aged (aged 25-64 years), and less likely to be from a high socioeconomic area or be admitted. Ongoing frequent attenders had higher rates of non-injury presentations, in particular substance-related (OR=2.5, 99% CI 1.1 to 5.6) and psychiatric illness (OR=2.9, 99% CI 1.8 to 4.6). In comparison, children who were ongoing were more likely than temporary frequent attenders to be aged 5-15 years, and were not more likely to be admitted (OR=2.7, 99% CI 0.7 to 10.9).

conclusionsFuture intervention studies should distinguish between temporary and ongoing frequent attenders, develop specific interventions for each group and include rigorous evaluation.

Indexed as

ForecastingAdultAustraliaEmergenciesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitalizationHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesemergency departmentlongitudinal studypersistentrepeat usesocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID31230013
PMCPMC6596941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.