Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31229512›Full record

ArticleCancer letters2019

Frequent amplifications of ESR1, ERBB2 and MDM4 in primary invasive lobular breast carcinoma.

Lan Cao, Ahmed Basudan, Matthew J Sikora, Amir Bahreini, Nilgun Tasdemir, Kevin M Levine, Rachel C Jankowitz, Priscilla F McAuliffe, David Dabbs, Sue Haupt and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic and Predictive Value ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lan CaoWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ahmed BasudanWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Matthew J SikoraWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Amir BahreiniWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Nilgun TasdemirWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Kevin M LevineWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Rachel C JankowitzUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology Oncology; University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Priscilla F McAuliffeWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
David DabbsDivision of Breast and Gynecologic Pathology, Department of Pathology, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Sue HauptPeter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia.
Ygal HauptPeter MacCallum Cancer Center, Melbourne, Australia.
Peter C LucasDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Adrian V LeeWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Steffi OesterreichWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jennifer M AtkinsonWomen's Cancer Research Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
Elucidating the function of WNT4 in endocrine response and resistance in invasive lobular carcinomaK99CA193734 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SIKORA, MATTHEW J · 2015 to 2016
$256k
Combination FGFR4 and ER-Targeted Therapy for Invasive Lobular CarcinomaF30CA203154 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LEVINE, KEVIN MAX · 2017 to 2020
$170k
NCI NIH HHS F30 CA203154NCI NIH HHS K99 CA193734NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most common histological subtype of breast cancer following invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). To identify potential genetic drivers of ILC progression, we used NanoString nCounter technology to investigate the DNA copy number (CN) in 70 well-curated primary ILC samples. We confirmed prior observations of frequent amplification of CCND1 (33%), and MYC (17%) in ILC, but additionally identified a substantial subset of ILCs with ESR1 and ERBB2 (19%) amplifications. Of interest, tumors with ESR1 CN gains (14%) and amplification (10%) were more likely to recur compared to those with normal CN. Finally, we observed that MDM4 (MDMX) was amplified in 17% of ILC samples. MDM4 knockdown in TP53 wild-type ILC cell lines caused increased apoptosis, decreased proliferation associated with cell cycle arrest, and concomitant activation of TP53 target genes. Similar effects were seen in TP53 mutant cells, indicting a TP53-independent role for MDM4 in ILC. To conclude, amplification of ESR1 and MDM4 are potential genetic drivers of ILC. These amplifications may represent actionable, targetable tumor dependencies, and thus have potential clinical implications and warrant further study.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Cycle ProteinsCell ProliferationDNA Copy Number VariationsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansBiomarkers, TumorCell Cycle ProteinsERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaMDM4 protein, humanProto-Oncogene ProteinsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53AmplificationERBB2ESR1ILCMDM4

Identifiers

PMID31229512
PMCPMC6682463
OpenAlexW2950516996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.