ArticleJournal of ovarian research2019
Decellularization of the mouse ovary: comparison of different scaffold generation protocols for future ovarian bioengineering.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bioengineering trends in female reproduction: a systematic review.Human reproduction update · 2022Pooled it
- Decellularized matrix grafts and peripheral nerve regeneration.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- The matrisome, methods, analytical evaluation and potential of decellularized porcine ovaries for fertility preservation.Cell and tissue research · 2026Review
- Preparation and characterization of human decellularized ovarian scaffold based on supercritical carbon dioxide protocol.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Article
- Bioactive scaffolds for tissue engineering: A review of decellularized extracellular matrix applications and innovations.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2025Review
- Enhancing organoid culture: harnessing the potential of decellularized extracellular matrix hydrogels for mimicking microenvironments.Journal of biomedical science · 2024Review
- Article
- Decellularization and Their Significance for Tissue Regeneration in the Era of 3D Bioprinting.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Reconstruction of ovarian follicular-like structure by recellularization of a cell-free human ovarian scaffold with mouse fetal ovarian cells.Cytotechnology · 2024Article
- Decellularized extracellular matrix biomaterials for regenerative therapies: Advances, challenges and clinical prospects.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- Current Strategies for Tracheal Decellularization: A Systematic Review.International journal of biomaterials · 2024Review
- Decellularised extracellular matrix-based injectable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications.Biomaterials translational · 2024Review
- Control of the growth and development of murine preantral follicles in a biomimetic ovary using a decellularized porcine scaffold.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- Perfusion preparation of the rat bladder decellularized scaffold.Regenerative therapy · 2023Article
- Article
- Prospects for use of bioengineered tissue from stem cells in gynecology.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023Article
- Novel Approaches Used in Ovarian Tissue Transplantation for Fertility Preservation: Focus on Tissue Engineering Approaches and Angiogenesis Capacity.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023Review
- Physical processing for decellularized nerve xenograft in peripheral nerve regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
- Reconstruction of the human nipple-areolar complex: a tissue engineering approach.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Anesthesia and analgesia for common research models of adult mice.Laboratory animal research · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn order to preserve fertility in young women with disseminated cancer, e.g. leukemia, an approach that has been suggested is to retransplant isolated small follicles within an ovarian matrix free from malignant cells and with no risk for contamination. The present study evaluates the first step to create a bioengineered ovarian construct that can act as growth-supporting tissue for isolated small follicles that are dependent on a stroma for normal follicular maturation. The present study used the intact mouse ovary to develop a mouse ovarian scaffold through various protocols of decellularization. MATERIAL AND
methodsPotential Immunogenic DNA and intracellular components were removed from whole mouse ovaries by agitation in a 0.5% sodium dodecyl sulfate solution (Protocol 1; P1), or in a 2% sodium deoxycholate solution (P2) or by a combination of the two (P3). The remaining decelluralized ovarian extracellular matrix structure was then assessed based on the DNA- and protein content, and was further evaluated histologically by haematoxylin and eosin-, Verhoeff's van gieson- (for elastin), Masson's trichrome- (for collagens) and Alcian blue (for glycosaminoglycans) staining. We also evaluated the decellularization efficiency using the mild detergent Triton-X100 (1%).
resultsSodium dodecyl sulfate efficiently removed DNA and intracellular components from the ovarian tissue but also significantly reduced the integrity of the remaining ovarian extracellular matrix. Sodium deoxycholate, a considerably milder detergent compared to sodium dodecyl sulfate, preserved the ovarian extracellular matrix better, evident by a more distinct staining for glycosaminoglycan, collagen and elastic fibres. Triton-X100 was found ineffective as a decellularization reagent for mouse ovaries in our settings.
conclusionsThe sodium dodecyl sulfate generated ovarian scaffolds contained minute amounts of DNA that may be an advantage to evade a detrimental immune response following engraftment. The sodium deoxycholate generated ovarian scaffolds had higher donor DNA content, yet, retained the extracellular composition better and may therefore have improved recellularization and other downstream bioengineering applications. These two novel types of mouse ovarian scaffolds serve as promising scaffold-candidates for future ovarian bioengineering experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.