Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31228647›Full record

SynthesisAgeing research reviews2019

A systematic review of existing ageism scales.

Liat Ayalon, Pnina Dolberg, Sarmitė Mikulionienė, Jolanta Perek-Białas, Gražina Rapolienė, Justyna Stypinska, Monika Willińska, Vânia de la Fuente-Núñez

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Ageing research reviews, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Determinants of Ageism against Older Adults: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ageism toward older adults among healthcare workers and students: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Psychometric Properties of the Anxiety About Aging Scale (AAS) in Lithuanian Adults.International journal of aging & human development · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Ageism and Health System Responsiveness to Older People: An Agenda for Action and Research.International journal of health policy and management · 2026
    Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Liat AyalonLouis and Gabi Weisfeld School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 52900, Israel.
Pnina DolbergRuppin Academic Center, Emek Hefer, 4025000, Israel.
Sarmitė MikulionienėInstitute of Sociology, Lithuanian Social Research Centre, Vilnius, LT-01108, Lithuania.
Jolanta Perek-BiałasInstitute of Sociology and Center of Evaluation and Public Policy Analysis, Jagiellonian University in Cracow, Cracow, 31-004, Poland.
Gražina RapolienėInstitute of Sociology, Lithuanian Social Research Centre, Vilnius, LT-01108, Lithuania.
Justyna StypinskaFree University Berlin, Institute for East European Studies, Department of Sociology, Berlin, 14195, Germany.
Monika WillińskaSchool of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, 551 11, Jönköping, Sweden.
Vânia de la Fuente-NúñezDepartment on Ageing and Life Course, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, Geneva, 1221, Switzerland. Electronic address: delafuentenunezv@who.int.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ageism has been shown to have a negative impact on older people's health and wellbeing. Though multiple scales are currently being used to measure this increasingly important issue, syntheses of the psychometric properties of these scales are unavailable. This means that existing estimates of ageism prevalence may not be accurate. We conducted a systematic review aimed at identifying available ageism scales and evaluating their scope and psychometric properties. A comprehensive search strategy was used across fourteen different databases, including PubMed and CINAHL. Independent reviewers extracted data and appraised risk of bias following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. Of the 29,664 records identified, 106 studies, assessing 11 explicit scales of ageism, were eligible for inclusion. Only one scale, the 'Expectations Regarding Aging' met minimum requirements for psychometric validation (i.e., adequate content validity, structural validity and internal consistency). Still, this scale only assesses the 'stereotype' dimension of ageism, thus failing to evaluate the other two ageism dimensions (prejudice and discrimination). This paper highlights the need to develop and validate a scale that accounts for the multidimensional nature of ageism. Having a scale that can accurately measure ageism prevalence is key in a time of increasing and rapid population ageing, where the magnitude of this phenomenon may be increasing.

Indexed as

AgeismPsychometricsHumansPrevalenceAgeismDiscriminationPrejudiceScaleStereotypeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31228647
PMCPMC6745621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.