Trial reportEuropean heart journal2020
Alert-based computerized decision support for high-risk hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation not prescribed anticoagulation: a randomized, controlled trial (AF-ALERT).
Trial report in European heart journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Alert-Based Computerized Decision Support for Stroke Prevention in High-Risk Hospitalized Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized, Controlled Trial (AF-ALERT)
Electronic Alert-Based Computerized Decision Support to Improve Testing For Primary Aldosteronism in Patients With Hypertension: ALERT-PA
Community-Based, Cluster-Randomized Trial of Electronic Alert-Based Computerized Decision Support to Prevent Stroke in High-Risk Ambulatory Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (AF-ALERT3)
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of a clinical decision support system on stroke care quality and outcomes in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (GOLDEN BRIDGE II): cluster randomised clinical trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2026Trial
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled ECGs for Atrial Fibrillation Identification and Enhanced Oral Anticoagulant Adoption: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Using a Clinical Decision Support System to Improve Anticoagulation in Patients with Nonvalve Atrial Fibrillation in China's Primary Care Settings: A Feasibility Study.International journal of clinical practice · 2023Trial
- Patients with perceived high-bleeding risk and computerized decision support for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an AF-ALERT substudy : Piazza: outcomes of high-bleeding risk AF patients.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2021Trial
- Qualitative Evaluation of a Clinical Decision-Support Tool for Improving Anticoagulation Control in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation in Primary Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Improvement of Oral Anticoagulant Prescription and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation After Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support System in Outpatient Practice.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Observational
- Factors Correlated with Anticoagulation Choice in Primary Care Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and High Stroke Risk.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Older and Frail Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Decade of Experience.Drugs & aging · 2024Review
- Clinical decision support systems to optimize adherence to anticoagulant guidelines in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Thrombosis journal · 2024Review
- Article
- Nudging within learning health systems: next generation decision support to improve cardiovascular care.European heart journal · 2022Article
- Electronic alerts to initiate anticoagulation dialogue in patients with atrial fibrillation.American heart journal · 2022Article
- Stroke risk factors and outcomes among hospitalized women with atrial fibrillation.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2021Observational
- SUPPORT-AF III: supporting use of AC through provider prompting about oral anticoagulation therapy for AF.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2021Article
- SUPPORT-AF IV: Supporting use of AC through provider prompting about oral anticoagulation therapy for AF clinical trial study protocol.Cardiovascular digital health journal · 2021Article
- Association of Socioeconomic Disadvantage With Mortality and Readmissions Among Older Adults Hospitalized for Pulmonary Embolism in the United States.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- A virtual platform to deliver ambulatory care for patients with atrial fibrillation.Cardiovascular digital health journal · 2021Article
- An Application of Machine Learning to Etiological Diagnosis of Secondary Hypertension: Retrospective Study Using Electronic Medical Records.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
- Current Drug Treatment Strategies for Atrial Fibrillation and TASK-1 Inhibition as an Emerging Novel Therapy Option.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Big Data and Atrial Fibrillation: Current Understanding and New Opportunities.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsDespite widely available risk stratification tools, safe and effective anticoagulant options, and guideline recommendations, anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) is underprescribed. We created and evaluated an alert-based computerized decision support (CDS) strategy to increase anticoagulation prescription in hospitalized AF patients at high risk for stroke. METHODS AND
resultsWe enrolled 458 patients (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥1) with AF who were not prescribed anticoagulant therapy and were hospitalized at Brigham and Women's Hospital. Patients were randomly allocated, according to Attending Physician of record, to intervention (alert-based CDS) vs. control (no notification). The primary efficacy outcome was the frequency of anticoagulant prescription. The CDS tool assigned 248 patients to the alert group and 210 to the control group. Patients in the alert group were more likely to be prescribed anticoagulation during the hospitalization (25.8% vs. 9.5%, P < 0.0001), at discharge (23.8% vs. 12.9%, P = 0.003), and at 90 days (27.7% vs. 17.1%, P = 0.007). The alert reduced the odds of a composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction (MI), cerebrovascular event, and systemic embolic event at 90 days [11.3% vs. 21.9%, P = 0.002; odds ratio (OR) 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.76]. The alert reduced the odds of MI at 90 days by 87% (1.2% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.0002; OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.04-0.45) and cerebrovascular events or systemic embolism at 90 days by 88% (0% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.02; OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.0-0.91).
conclusionAn alert-based CDS strategy increased anticoagulation in high-risk hospitalized AF patients and reduced major adverse cardiovascular events, including MI and stroke. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02339493.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.