ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2020
No effect of acidification or freezing on urinary metanephrine levels.
Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reference intervals for plasma, urinary, and salivary concentrations of free metanephrines in dogs: Relevance to the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUrinary metanephrine is a reliable method to estimate catecholamine secretion. Traditionally, urinary metanephrines are collected into chilled containers containing hydrochloric acid (HCl) and most laboratories freeze urinary samples before analysis. It is uncertain if these pre-analytic procedures alter metanephrine values.
aimTo evaluate if acidifying and freezing urine samples affect the accuracy of urinary metanephrine measurements.
methodsRandom urine samples from healthy individuals were collected. Urine samples were distributed into two containers: with HCl 50% homogenized with urine to obtain pH < 2, and without HCl. Each container was divided again into aliquots for immediate measurement or freezing. One aliquot with acid (group 1) and another without acid (group 2) were sent immediately to the laboratory for testing (HPLC), while the other two aliquots, one with acid (group 3) and another without it (group 4) were frozen for 3 months at - 20 °C. Bland-Altman's test was used to analyze inter-assay agreement between measurements.
resultsA total of 15 individuals were included (mean age 27.5 ± 5.9 years, 8 male and 14 white). No difference was observed on mean urinary metanephrine/creatinine ratio between groups: group 1: 0.23 ± 0.11, group 2: 0.22 ± 0.07, group 3: 0.25 ± 0.13, group 4: 0.25 ± 0.15 mg/g creatinine; P > 0.05 for all the comparisons). Bland-Altman's analysis showed agreement between the standard method (group 1) and the experimental method (group 4).
conclusionMeasurement of urinary metanephrines by HPLC method is not influenced by sample acidification nor freezing at - 20 °C for 3 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31228104What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.