Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31228088›Full record

SynthesisTropical animal health and production2019

Meta-analysis of the prevalence and risk factors associated with bovine neosporosis.

Claudia Mello Ribeiro, Isabela Ribeiro Soares, Rodrigo Guerrero Mendes, Paula Andrea de Santis Bastos, Satie Katagiri, Renato Bacarin Zavilenski, Hudson Felipe Porto de Abreu, Vera Afreixo

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tropical animal health and production, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prevalence of Neospora caninum in cows and sheep in Kyrgyzstan.Tropical animal health and production · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Seropositivity and Risk Factors forAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  5. Current knowledge about neosporosis in Colombia.Veterinary research communications · 2026
    Review
  6. Microorganisms · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Anti-Neospora caninum and anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in cattle intended for human consumption in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil: prevalence and associated factors.Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. EpidemiologicalAnimal reproduction · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. The Utility of Serological Analysis forAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Molecular and Serological Evaluation ofIranian journal of parasitology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudia Mello RibeiroUniversidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. clau.mribeiro@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9247-1445
Isabela Ribeiro SoaresFaculdade de Ciências Sociais e Agrárias de Itapeva, Itapeva, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rodrigo Guerrero MendesUniversidade Nove de Julho, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paula Andrea de Santis BastosCentro Universitário das Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Satie KatagiriUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Barra do Garças, Mato Grosso, Brazil.
Renato Bacarin ZavilenskiFaculdade de Ciências Sociais e Agrárias de Itapeva, Itapeva, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hudson Felipe Porto de AbreuFaculdade de Ciências Sociais e Agrárias de Itapeva, Itapeva, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vera AfreixoDepartment of Mathematics, Universidade de Aveiro, District of Aveiro, Portugal.
Universidade Nove de Julho · BRCentro Universitário das Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BRUniversity of Aveiro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neospora caninum is one of the main infectious agents that cause reproductive disorders in cattle. However, knowledge about the prevalence and causal factors of bovine neosporosis is needed in order to establish control measures. The purpose of this study was to estimate the pooled prevalence and determine the risk factors of bovine neosporosis using meta-analytic methods. Searches for data on N. caninum seroprevalence and potential risk factors were conducted in the PubMed, LILACS, and SciElo databases. The random effects model was used for the meta-analysis of the included studies. The pooled prevalence of N. caninum in cattle was 24% (95% confidence interval (CI), 19-29) in North and Central America, 24% (95% CI, 20-28) in South America, 18% (95% CI, 14-21) in Asia, 15% (95% CI, 12-18) in Europe, 13% (95% CI, 11-16) in Africa, and 8% (95% CI, 4-14) in Oceania. A significant correlation was found between N. caninum infection and abortion in cows (odds ratio (OR) = 2.66, 95% CI, 1.97-3.59). The following risk factors were signicantly associated with N. caninum seroprevalence: presence of dogs on the farm (OR = 2.84; 95% CI, 1.40-5.80) and the type of cattle production system, with dairy cattle being more susceptible to bovine neosporosis (OR = 1.60; 95% CI, 1.16-2.19) than beef cattle. The adoption of measures to prevent the dissemination of N. caninum in cattle herds is suggested, aiming to reduce the economic losses incurred to the dairy and beef industry.

Indexed as

AnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesCoccidiosisFemaleNeosporaPrevalenceRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesBovine neosporosisMeta-analysisPrevalenceRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID31228088
OpenAlexW2952777154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.