Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31228053›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2019

Patient-Reported Barriers to Completing a Diagnostic Colonoscopy Following Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Among Uninsured Patients.

Katelyn K Jetelina, Joshua S Yudkin, Stacie Miller, Emily Berry, Alicea Lieberman, Samir Gupta, Bijal A Balasubramanian

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01946282 (Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening for the Uninsured), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01946282 nacompletednot on this map

Evidence-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening for the Uninsured

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterRan2013 to 2017Enrolled8,565ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsFIT Invitation Only, FIT plus $5 Incentive, FIT plus $10 Incentive
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Developing Patient-Refined Messaging for Follow-Up Colonoscopy After Abnormal Fecal Testing in Hispanic Communities: Key Learnings from Virtual Boot Camp Translation.Hispanic health care international : the official journal of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Cancer Screening after the Adoption of Paid-Sick-Leave Mandates.The New England journal of medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Colorectal Cancer Screening Prevalence, Perceived Barriers, and Preference for Screening Colonoscopy Among Hospitalized Women.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katelyn K JetelinaDepartment of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Public Health, 6011 Harry Hines Blvd. V8.112, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA. Katelyn.k.jetelina@uth.tmc.edu.
Joshua S YudkinDepartment of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Public Health, 6011 Harry Hines Blvd. V8.112, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Stacie MillerHarold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Emily BerryHarold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Alicea LiebermanRady School of Management, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Samir GuptaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
Bijal A BalasubramanianDepartment of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center, School of Public Health, 6011 Harry Hines Blvd. V8.112, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor colorectal cancer (CRC) screening to improve survival, patients with an abnormal fecal immunochemical test (FIT) must follow-up with a diagnostic colonoscopy. Adherence to follow-up is low and patient-level barriers for suboptimal adherence have yet to be explored.

objectiveTo characterize barriers for non-completion of diagnostic colonoscopy after an abnormal FIT reported by under- and uninsured patients receiving care in a safety-net health system.

designA longitudinal, cohort study of CRC screening outreach to 8565 patients using mailed FIT kits. Patients with abnormal FIT results received telephonic navigation to arrange for a no-cost diagnostic colonoscopy. PATIENTS: Adults aged 50-64 years receiving care at a North Texas safety-net health system. APPROACH: Descriptive analyses characterized the patient sample and reasons for lack of follow-up after abnormal FIT over the 3-year outreach program. Thematic qualitative analyses characterized reasons for lack of follow-up with a colonoscopy after the abnormal FIT. KEY

resultsOf 689 patients with an abnormal FIT, 45% (n = 314) did not complete a follow-up colonoscopy. Among the 314 non-completers, 184 patients reported reasons for not completing a follow-up colonoscopy included health insurance-related challenges (38%), comorbid conditions (37%), social barriers such as transportation difficulties and lack of social support (29%), concerns about FIT/colonoscopy process (12%), competing life priorities (12%), adverse effects of bowel preparation (3%), and poor health literacy (3%). Among the 314 non-completers, 131 patients did not report a barrier, as 51% reported that that had completed a previous colonoscopy in the past 10 years, 10% refused with no reason, and 10% were never reached by phone.

conclusionsFuture studies aimed at improving FIT screening and subsequent colonoscopy rates need to address the unique needs of patients for effective and sustainable screening programs.

trial registrationNCT01946282.

Indexed as

Occult BloodPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresCohort StudiesColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsComorbidityFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMedically UninsuredMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePsychosocial Support Systemscolorectal cancerdiagnostic colonoscopyfecal immunochemical testsafety-netscreening

Identifiers

PMID31228053
PMCPMC6712145
OpenAlexW2950384541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.