Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31228046›Full record

ReviewJournal of muscle research and cell motility2019

Nemaline myopathies: a current view.

Caroline A Sewry, Jenni M Laitila, Carina Wallgren-Pettersson

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The D2.B10-DmdThe American journal of pathology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Novel Splice Site Variant inMolecular syndromology · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025
    Article
  16. Muscular Dystrophies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Caroline A SewryDubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, UCL Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK. c.sewry@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4870-582X
Jenni M LaitilaFolkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Carina Wallgren-PetterssonFolkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FIGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nemaline myopathies are a heterogenous group of congenital myopathies caused by de novo, dominantly or recessively inherited mutations in at least twelve genes. The genes encoding skeletal α-actin (ACTA1) and nebulin (NEB) are the commonest genetic cause. Most patients have congenital onset characterized by muscle weakness and hypotonia, but the spectrum of clinical phenotypes is broad, ranging from severe neonatal presentations to onset of a milder disorder in childhood. Most patients with adult onset have an autoimmune-related myopathy with a progressive course. The wide application of massively parallel sequencing methods is increasing the number of known causative genes and broadening the range of clinical phenotypes. Nemaline myopathies are identified by the presence of structures that are rod-like or ovoid in shape with electron microscopy, and with light microscopy stain red with the modified Gömöri trichrome technique. These rods or nemaline bodies are derived from Z lines (also known as Z discs or Z disks) and have a similar lattice structure and protein content. Their shape in patients with mutations in KLHL40 and LMOD3 is distinctive and can be useful for diagnosis. The number and distribution of nemaline bodies varies between fibres and different muscles but does not correlate with severity or prognosis. Additional pathological features such as caps, cores and fibre type disproportion are associated with the same genes as those known to cause the presence of rods. Animal models are advancing the understanding of the effects of various mutations in different genes and paving the way for the development of therapies, which at present only manage symptoms and are aimed at maintaining muscle strength, joint mobility, ambulation, respiration and independence in the activities of daily living.

Indexed as

MutationMyopathies, NemalineActinsAge of OnsetHumansMicrofilament ProteinsMuscle ProteinsSarcomeresACTA1 protein, humanActinsKLHL40 protein, humanLMOD3 protein, humanMicrofilament ProteinsMuscle ProteinsnebulinAnimal modelsCongenital myopathyNemaline myopathyRod bodiesRodsZ discZ line

Identifiers

PMID31228046
PMCPMC6726674
OpenAlexW2953375449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.