Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31228039›Full record

ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2019

Assessment of warfarin algorithms for hospitalized adults: searching for a safe dosing strategy.

Jessica L Cohen, Elena Thompson, Liron Sinvani, Andrzej Kozikowski, Guang Qiu, Renee Pekmezaris, Alex C Spyropoulos, Jason J Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica L CohenDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwell Health, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA. jcohen11@northwell.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3272-7891
Elena ThompsonDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Liron SinvaniDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwell Health, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Andrzej KozikowskiDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Guang QiuDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, Northwell Health, 300 Community Drive, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Renee PekmezarisDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Alex C SpyropoulosDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Jason J WangDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.
Northwell Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluates three warfarin dosing algorithms (Kimmel, Dawson, High Dose ≥ 2.5 mg) for hospitalized older adults. A random selection of 250 patients with overshoots (INR ≥ 5 after 48 h of hospitalization) and 250 patients without overshoots were accessed from a database of 12,107 inpatients ≥ 65 years treated with chronic warfarin during hospitalization between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2016. Algorithms were retrospectively applied to patients 2 days prior to overshoots in the overshoot group, and 2 days prior to the maximum INR reached after 48 h of hospitalization in the non-overshoot group. Patients were categorized as overdosed or not overdosed and compared using descriptive statistics. Logistic regression modeling determined predictors for overshoots. There was no significant difference between overdose and non-overdose groups for progressing to overshoots by the Kimmel (51.0% vs. 48.7%, p = 0.67) or Dawson (48.5 vs. 57.9%, p = 0.19) algorithms. The Low Dose Group (≤ 2.5 mg) was significantly more likely to experience an overshoot than the High Dose Group (56.6% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.04). The Low Dose Group was more likely to be older (81.4% vs. 71.1%, p = 0.02), female (63.5% vs. 49.8%, p = 0.02), weigh less (71.3 ± 21.9 vs. 79 ± 23.1, p = 0.002), and be prescribed amiodarone (16.6% vs. 8.1%, p = 0.01). While none of the algorithms predicted overshoots in logistic regression modeling, weight over 70 kg and black race remained protective. The High Dose Algorithm revealed that providers appropriately gave lower doses to patients at highest risk for warfarin sensitivity. Future studies are needed to investigate tools for inpatient warfarin dosing in older adults.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedAged, 80 and overAmiodaroneDrug Dosage CalculationsFemaleHospitalizationHumansInternational Normalized RatioMaleRetrospective StudiesWarfarinAmiodaroneWarfarinDose algorithmInpatientsInternational normalized ratioWarfarin

Identifiers

PMID31228039
OpenAlexW2949774458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.