Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31228013›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of clinical dermatology2019

Feasibility and Utility of the Psoriasis Symptom Inventory (PSI) in Clinical Care Settings: A Study from the International Psoriasis Council.

Bruce Strober, Peter C M van de Kerkhof, Kristina Callis Duffin, Yves Poulin, Richard B Warren, Claudia de la Cruz, Joelle M van der Walt, Bradley S Stolshek, Mona L Martin, Andre V E de Carvalho

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of clinical dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bruce StroberUniversity of Connecticut Health Center, 21 South Road, Second Floor, Farmington, CT, 06032, USA. strober@centralctderm.com.
Peter C M van de KerkhofRadboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kristina Callis DuffinUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Yves PoulinLaval University and Centre de Recherche Dermatologique du Quebec Metropolitain, Quebec City, QC, Canada.
Richard B WarrenDermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Claudia de la CruzClínica Dermacross, Santiago, Chile.
Joelle M van der WaltInternational Psoriasis Council, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Bradley S StolshekAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
Mona L MartinHealth Research Associates, Inc., Seattle, WA, USA.
Andre V E de CarvalhoSanta Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre Hospital, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Psoriasis Symptom Inventory (PSI) is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess psoriasis signs and symptoms.

objectivesThe aim was to assess the usefulness of the PSI in enhancing patient care in the clinical setting.

methodsEight dermatology clinics in six countries enrolled adults representing the full spectrum of psoriasis severity who regularly received care at the clinic. Patients were administered the eight-item PSI (score range 0-32; higher scores indicate greater severity) while waiting for the physician; the physician conducted a static physician global assessment (sPGA) and estimated psoriasis-affected body surface area (BSA) at the same visit. Physicians completed a brief questionnaire after each patient visit, and were interviewed about the PSI after all patients were seen.

resultsThe clinics enrolled 278 patients; mean [standard deviation (SD)] psoriasis-affected BSA was 7.6% (11.4). Based on BSA, 47.8% had mild psoriasis, 29.1% had moderate psoriasis, and 23.0% had severe psoriasis. Based on sPGA, 18.7% were clear/almost clear, 67.3% were mild/moderate, and 14.0% were severe/very severe. The mean (SD) PSI total score was 12.2 (8.3). Physicians spent a mean (SD) 4.9 (4.8) min discussing PSI findings with their patients (range 0-20 min). Key benefits of PSI discussions included the following: new information regarding symptom location and severity for physicians; prompting of quality-of-life discussions; better understanding of patient treatment priorities; change in treatment regimens to target specific symptoms or areas; and improvement of patient-physician relationship.

conclusionsThe PSI was useful for treated and untreated patients to enhance patient-physician communication, and influenced treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresSeverity of Illness IndexAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Decision-MakingCommunicationCross-Sectional StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansInternational CooperationMaleMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient Relations

Identifiers

PMID31228013
PMCPMC6764927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.