Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31227999›Full record

ReviewCurrent infectious disease reports2019

Update on HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis: Effectiveness, Drug Resistance, and Risk Compensation.

Victoria E Powell, Kevin M Gibas, Joshua DuBow, Douglas S Krakower

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current infectious disease reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV: effective and underused.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Victoria E PowellDivision of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 110 Francis St. W/LMOB, Suite GB, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Kevin M GibasDivision of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 110 Francis St. W/LMOB, Suite GB, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Joshua DuBowDivision of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 110 Francis St. W/LMOB, Suite GB, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Douglas S KrakowerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 110 Francis St. W/LMOB, Suite GB, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. dkrakowe@bidmc.harvard.edu.

Funding

The impact of HIV viral diversity and cellular immunity on HIV pathogenesisP30AI060354 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI RAJESH T GANDHI · 2004 to 2026
$94.4M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI060354NIH HHS P30 AI060354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn 2019, the US government launched an initiative to decrease new HIV infections by 90% over the next decade. Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for high-risk populations, and the United States Preventative Services Task Force has issued a grade A recommendation for PrEP, indicating substantial net benefit. However, questions have been raised about the effectiveness of PrEP in clinical settings and whether PrEP use might promote antiretroviral drug resistance and increased sexual risk behaviors, which could increase transmission of bacterial sexually transmitted infections. In this narrative review, we summarize recent evidence of the effectiveness of PrEP when provided in clinical and community settings, the emergence of antiretroviral drug resistance during PrEP use, and associations between PrEP use and increased sexual risk behaviors. We also review novel PrEP modalities that are being developed to optimize PrEP acceptability, adherence, and effectiveness. RECENT

findingsStudies suggest that PrEP is effective when provided in clinical settings. However, PrEP uptake and impact have been limited in the USA thus far, and major disparities in access to PrEP exist. In addition, there is evidence that drug resistance can occur with PrEP use, particularly with inadvertent PrEP use during undiagnosed acute HIV infection. Risk compensation can also occur with PrEP use and has been associated with increased sexually transmitted infections. Promising new modalities for PrEP could expand options. PrEP has strong potential to decrease HIV incidence. However, disparities in access must be addressed to ensure equity and impact for PrEP. While drug resistance and risk compensation can occur with PrEP use, these are not valid reasons to withhold PrEP from patients given its substantial protective benefits.

Indexed as

Clinical effectivenessDrug resistanceHIVPreexposure prophylaxisRisk compensation

Identifiers

PMID31227999
PMCPMC8635937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.